Comparison of Tensile Fracture Behavior between Si-Ti-C-O Fiber Bundle (Yarn), Woven Fabric of Yarn and Laminated Composite of the Si-Ti-C-O Fabric / Mullite Filler / Polytitanocarbosilane System

Article Preview

Abstract:

A polytitanocarbosilane (20-30 mass%)-xylene solution was infiltrated into a porous laminated composite with 35-40 vol% Si-Ti-C-O fabric of 11 diameter fiber and 15-25 vol% mullite filler, and decomposed at 1000°C in an Ar atmosphere. This polymer impregnation and pyrolysis method was repeated 8 times to produce the composites of 76-82 % theoretical density. The yarn (662-765 filament / yarn), fabric and composite provided the following average strengths : 1240 MPa for the yarn; 768 MPa for the fabric; 117 MPa for the composite. The fracture probability of the yarn, fabric and composite was well fitted by the normal distribution function. The tensile strength of the composite was interpreted by the product of the effective fiber content, the Young's modulus of the fiber and elongation of the composite.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

432-437

Citation:

Online since:

June 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T.S. Gonczy, R. Goettler and S. Wansom, Tensile Testing of Oxide Ceramic Fibers in Single Filament and Multifilament Tow Configurations, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 21, 549-557 (2000).

DOI: 10.1002/9780470294628.ch64

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Hirata, T. Maeda and T. Ono, Impregnation and Pyrolysis of Polytitanocarbosilane in an Si-Ti-C-O Fabric / Mullite Porous Composite and Tensile Strength of the Densified Composite, 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 50 100 150 200 Calculated strength / MPa Measured strength / MPa Fig. 3 Relationship between the measured and calculated strengths ( Eq. (2) in text ) of the laminated composites of 35-40 vol% Si-Ti-C-O fabric, 15-25 vol% mullite filler and 18-26 vol% PTC- derived solid and 1. 8-24 vol% porosity. The straight line represents the calculated strength / measured strength ratio = 1. J. Ceram. Proc. Res., 3, 241-246 (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Hirata, T. Matura and K. Hayata, Infiltration and Pyrolysis of Polytitanocarbosilane in an Si-Ti-C-O Fabrics / Mullite Porous Composite, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 83, 1044-1048 (2000).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01328.x

Google Scholar

[4] D.M. Wilson, Statistical Tensile Strength of Nextel 610 and Nextel 720 Fibers, J. Mater. Sci., 32, 2535-2542 (1997).

Google Scholar

[5] S.M. Toffoli and R.L. Lehman, Determination of Individual Fiber Failure in Fiber Bundle, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 84, 123-128 (2001).

Google Scholar

[6] P.A. Siemers, R.L. Mehan and M.H. Moran, A Comparison of the Uniaxial Tensile and Pure Bending Strength of Silicon Carbide Filaments, J. Mater. Sci., 23, 1329-1333 (1988).

DOI: 10.1007/bf01154597

Google Scholar

[7] T. Yamamura, T. Ishikawa, M. Shibuya and K. Okamura, Development of a New Continuous Si-Ti-C-O Fiber Using an Organometllic Polymer Precursor, J. Mater. Sci., 23, 2589-2594 (1988).

DOI: 10.1007/bf01111919

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Hirata and K. Takeshima, Effects of Particle Classificarion on Colloidal Processing of Mullite, Mater. Lett., 16, 169-174 (1993).

DOI: 10.1016/0167-577x(93)90157-s

Google Scholar

[9] J. Sugimoto, Y. Hirata and M. Shibuya, Tensile Strength and Weibull Modulus of the Si-Ti-C-O Fiber Yarn and Woven Fabric, J. Ceram. Soc. Japan, Suppl. 112, S385-S389 (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] T. Ono, M. Kaji and Y. Hirata, Fracture Behavior of Si-Ti-C-O Fiber / Mullite Matrix Composites Under Anticlastic Bending Test, J. Ceram. Soc. Japan, 106, 1147-1150 (1998).

DOI: 10.2109/jcersj.106.1147

Google Scholar

[11] T. Ono, Y. Kyoden and Y. Hirata, Influence of Fabric Node of Filament Yarn on the Fracture of Si-Ti-C-O Fiber / Mullite Laminate Composites Under Anticlastic Bending Test, J. Ceram. Soc. Japan, 108, 424-427 (2000).

DOI: 10.2109/jcersj.108.1256_424

Google Scholar