High Frequency Dielectric Mapping Using Un-Contact Probe for Dielectric Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

The microwave reflection intensity was measured at room temperature for Cu-plate, Al2O3 and SrTiO3 single crystals using a un-contact probe as a function of distance between sample and probe. The difference of reflection intensity for Cu-plate, Al2O3 and SrTiO3 single crystals was observed in the region where the distance of 0.2mm between sample and probe, and it was caused from dielectric permittivities of samples. The reflection coefficient of sample was estimated in comparison with results of electromagnetic simulation using finite differential time domain method. The reflection intensity for Cu-plate, Al2O3 and SrTiO3 single crystals was transformed to dielectric permittivity at reflection intensity minimum point. The dielectric permittivity mapping was also examined at reflection intensity minimum point.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

189-192

Citation:

Online since:

September 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Chazono and H. Kishi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40 (2001) 5624.

Google Scholar

[2] A. J. Moulson and J. M. Herbert, �Electroceramics, Properties, Applications, 2nd edition� Jhon Wiley & Sons (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] B. W. Hakki and P. D. Coleman, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 8 (1960) 381.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Kobayashi and M. Katoh, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 33 (1985) 586.

Google Scholar

[5] D. E. Steinhauer, C. P. Vlahacos, C. Canedy, A. Stanishevsky, J. Melngailis, R. Ramesh, F. C. Wellstood, and Steven M. Anlage, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999) 3180.

DOI: 10.1063/1.125270

Google Scholar

[6] D. E. Steinhauer, C. P. Vlahacos, F. C. Wellstood, Steven M. Anlage, C. Canedy, R. Ramesh, A. Stanishevsky and J. Melngailis, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71 (2000) 2751.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1150687

Google Scholar

[7] H. Kakemoto, J. Li, S-M. Num, S. Wada and T. Tsurumi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42 (2001) 6143.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Okada, �Microwave Engineering�Gakken-sha, Tokyo (1993) [in Japanese].

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Kato, �Denpa Ku-chu Senro no Kenkyu�Kyoritsu-shuppan, Tokyo (1941) [in Japanese].

Google Scholar

[10] T. Uno, �Electromagnetic field and antenna analysis using FDTD method�Corona-sha, Tokyo (1998) [in Japanese].

Google Scholar

[11] M. N. Afsar, J. R. Birch and P. N. Clarke, Proc. of The IEEE 74 (1986) 183.

Google Scholar

[12] S. S. Stuchly, M. A. Rzepecka, and M. F. Iskander, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 23 (1974) 56.

Google Scholar

[13] H. Kakemoto, S. Wada, and T. Tsurumi, Key Engineering Materials 301 (2006).

Google Scholar

[1] 4 1 10 100 1000 0.

Google Scholar

[1] 2 0 0. 5 1 1. 5 Fig. 8 Dielectric permittivity mapping using test-probe. Cu ALO.

Google Scholar

[9] 4GHz Fig. 9 Reflection intensity mapping of Al2O3/Cu-plate using micro-probe. 5x5.

Google Scholar

[8] 5GHz Fig. 2 Reflection intensity for Cu-plate as a function of distance between probe and Cu-plate (a), and reflection intensity for Cu-plate versus phase at distance of 0. 2mm (b) from 8. 6GHz to 10GHz. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Distance (mm) Intensity (arb. units).

Google Scholar

[9] 4GHz.

Google Scholar

[8] 6GHz 10GHz 9GHz Cu-plate a) 0 100 200 300 Phase (deg. ) Intensity (arb. units) b).

Google Scholar

[8] 6GHz 10GHz 9GHz #2 #3.

Google Scholar

[9] 4GHz 0.

Google Scholar

3 0 1 2 3 4 5 Distance (mm) Intensity (V).

Google Scholar

[9] 4GHz STO ALO Fig. 3 Reflection intensity of Al2O3 and SrTiO3 single crystals versus distance between probe and sample measured at 9. 4GHz. Fig. 4 The result of curve fitting for reflection intensity of Cu-plate versus distance between probe and sample.

Google Scholar

05 Intensity (V) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Distance (mm) Cu-plate.

Google Scholar

[9] 4GHz Fig. 5 Reflection intensity and coefficient of Al2O3 and SrTiO3 single crystal.

Google Scholar

05 Intensity (V).

Google Scholar

0 Distance (mm).

Google Scholar

2 Γ ALO STO Fig. 6 Reflection coefficient of samples as a function of effective area (a), and effective are of samples versus dielectric permittivity. STO ALO b) 1 10 100 1000 10000 0 1 2 3 4 5 Electrical length (mm) Dielectric permittivity Fig. 7 Dielectric permittivity of Al2O3 and SrTiO3 single crystal versus distance. STO ALO.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822283-6.00006-4

Google Scholar

[8] 9 310.

Google Scholar

[9] 4GHz S(mm 2) εr a) ALO STO S (mm 2) |Γ|.

Google Scholar