Non-Invasive Analysis of the Micro-Structural and Biomechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in Human Femoral Head

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigates micro-structural and mechanical properties of trabecular bone in human femoral head with and without osteoporosis using a micro-CT and a finite element model. 15 cored trabecular bone specimens with 20  of diameter were obtained from femoral heads with osteoporosis resected for total hip arthroplasty, and 5 specimens were removed from femoral head of cadavers, which has no history of musculoskeletal diseases. A high-resolution micro-CT system was used to scan each specimen to obtain histomorphometry indexes. Based on the micro-images, a FE-model was created to determine mechanical property indexes. While the non-osteoporosis group had increases the trabecular thickness, the bone volume, the bone volume fraction, the degree of anisotropy and the trabecular number compared with those of osteoporotic group, the non-osteoporotic group showed decreases in trabecular separation and structure model index. Regarding the mechanical property indexes, the reaction force and the Young's modulus were lower in the osteoporotic group than in non-osteoporotic group. Our data shows salient deteriorations in trabecular micro-structural and mechanical properties in human femoral head with osteoporosis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 321-323)

Pages:

1070-1073

Citation:

Online since:

October 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Zhu, T.S. Keller, and D.M. Spengler: J. Biomech Vol. 27 (1994), pp.57-66.

Google Scholar

[2] X.G. Cheng, P.H. Nicholson, S. Boonen, G. Lowet, P. Bray, J. Aerssens, G. Perre, and J. Dequeker: J Bone Miner Res Vol. 12 (1997), pp.1721-728.

DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1721

Google Scholar

[3] K. Singer, S. Edmondston, R. Day, P. Breidahl, and R. Price: Bone Vol. 17 (1995), pp.167-174.

Google Scholar

[4] T.M. Keaveny, T.P. Pinilla, R.P. Crawford, D.L. Kopperdahl and A. Lou: J Orthopaed Res Vol. 15 (1997), pp.101-110.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Odgaard and F. Linde: J. Biomech Vol. 24 (1991), pp.691-698.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Zhu, T.S. Keller, and D.M. Spengler: J. Biomech Vol. 27 (1994), pp.57-66.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Parfitt, M. Drezner, F. Glorieux, J. Kanis J Malluche, P. Meunier, S Ott and R. Recker: J Bone and Miner Res Vol. 2 (1987), pp.595-608.

DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020617

Google Scholar

[8] B. van Rietbergen, H. Weinans, R. Huiskes and A. Odgaard: J. Biomech Vol. 28 (1995), pp.69-81.

Google Scholar

[9] F. Chevalier, A. Laval-Jeantet and M. Laval-Jeantet: Calcified Tissue Int Vol. 51 (1992), pp.8-13.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00296208

Google Scholar

[10] C. Cooper: Calcified Tissue Int Vol. 53 (1993), pp.23-26.

Google Scholar

[11] D.W. Dempster, M.W. Ferguson-Pell, R.W. Mellish, G.V. Cochran, F. Xie, C. Fey, W. Herbert, M. Parisien and R. Lindsay: Osteoporosis Int Vol. 3 (1993), pp.90-96.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01623379

Google Scholar

[13] J. Kabel, B. van Rietbergen, M. Dalstra, A. Odgaard, and R. Huiskes: J Biomech Vol. 32 (1999), pp.673-680.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00045-7

Google Scholar