The Effect of Ceramic Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite Resin to All-Ceramic Coping Materials

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin to 4 different all-ceramic coping materials with 3 different surface treatments after thermocycling and without thermocycling. Three different surface treatments - sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles (AB); sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles and acid etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid (AE); sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles and 30 ㎛ alumina particles with tribochemical silica coating (SI) and silane application - were used on four different all-ceramic; Feldspatic ceramic (Duceram Plus); Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress2); Alumica ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina); Zirconia ceramic (Zi-Ceram) - substrates. Shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to substrate was tested after thermocycling and without thermocycling (n=10). Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 2 ㎜/min until fracture. Two-way analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison test (α =0.05) were used to analyze the bond strength values. There were significant differences in the bond strengths for ceramic types (P<.001), surface treatments (P<.001), and thermocycling (P<.001). The Duncan analysis showed that the Si specimens had significantly higher bonding strengths than other specimens. The bond strength of composite resin decreased after thermocycling.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 330-332)
• Pages: 1365-1368
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.330-332.1365
• Online since: February 2007
• Authors: W.H. Kim, H.J. Lee, Keun Woo Lee, Kwang Mahn Kim, Kyoung Nam Kim, J.S. Shim
• Keywords: All-Ceramic System, Composite Resins, Intra-Oral Repair, Shear Bond Strength, Silica Coating, Thermocycling, Tribochemical Bonding

References

[1] Dong JK et al., Int. J. Prosthodont. Vol. 5 (1992), p.9.

[2] Probster L et al., Quintessence. Int. Vol. 23 (1992), p.25.

[3] Hummel M et al., Dent. Mater. Vol. 20(2004), p.498.

[4] Bo-Kyoung Kim et al., J. Prosthet. Dent. Vol. 94(2005), p.357.

[5] Frankenberger R et al., Oper. Dent. Vol. 25(2000), p.209.

[6] Edelhoff D et al., J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. Vol. 13(2001), p.350.

[7] Woo Hyun Kim et al., Key. Eng. Mater. Vol 309-311(2005), p.1405.

[8] Neikes MJ et al., J. Dent. Res. Vol. 71(1992), p.533.