[1]
M. Pfestorf, Manufacturing of High Strength Steel and Aluminium for a mixed material body in white: Tagungsband SheMet'05, Erlangen, Germany, 109-124.
Google Scholar
[2]
J. H. Hollomon, L. D. Jaffe, Time-Temperature Relationships in Tempering Steel: Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers 162 (1945), 233-249.
Google Scholar
[3]
H. -J. Bargel, G. Schulze, Werkstoffkunde, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, (1983).
Google Scholar
[4]
http: /www. tailored-blanks. com/de/news/ [12. 09. 2006].
Google Scholar
[5]
M. Merklein, J. Lechler, Investigation of the thermo-mechanical properties of hot stamping steels: Journal of Materials Processing Technology 177 (2006), 452-455.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.233
Google Scholar
[6]
M. A. McCarthy and J. F. M. Wiggenraad, Numerical investigation of a crash test of a composite helicopter subfloor structure: Composite Structures 51 (2001), 345-359.
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(00)00150-1
Google Scholar
[7]
M. Mahé, H. Ribet and F. Le Page, Composite fuselage crash FE modelling dedicated to enhance the design in correlation with full scale drop test: Mécanique & Industries, Vol. 2 (2001), 5-17.
DOI: 10.1016/s1296-2139(00)01081-2
Google Scholar
[8]
Hoesch Hohenlimburg, Warmgewalzte, borlegierte Stähle - Die starke Alternative mit wirtschaftlichem Fokus, company brochure, (2006).
Google Scholar
[9]
L. Engel, H. Klingele, Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen von Metallschäden, Hanser Verlag, München, 1982. Type of fabrication Fmax [kN] Faver [kN] deformation length [mm] Ezug [kNm] Type 1A (hard) direct stamp hardening 162. 7 ± 11. 1 90. 9 ± 4. 5 196. 6 ± 10. 9 16. 9 ± 0. 5 Type 1A (hard) + CDP direct stamp hardening 152. 0 ± 8. 6 86. 0 ± 5. 1 211. 8 ± 8. 7 15. 8 ± 0. 4 Type 1B (annealed) direct stamp hardening 143. 3 ± 7. 9 83. 9 ± 3. 5 214. 3 ± 6. 2 15. 3 ± 0. 5 Type 1B (annealed) + CDP direct stamp hardening 147. 6 ± 2. 4 84. 4 ± 3. 5 211. 9 ± 9. 2 15. 4 ± 0. 4 Type 2 (hard) indirect stamp hardening 158. 4 ± 13. 1 89. 0 ± 22. 2 210. 1 ± 35. 1 15. 6 ± 2. 9.
DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(81)90294-5
Google Scholar