Experimental Study on Specimen and Grain Size Effects in Uniaxial Tension Test of Aluminum Foil

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the rapidly growing demand for the micro-thin-wall parts, the development of high accurate forming processes for very thin sheet or foil becomes more and more important. The aim of this study is to explore the effects of specimen width and grain size on tensile strength of aluminum alloy 3003 foil in uniaxial tension test. The problem was approached in two ways: firstly, by reduction of the specimen width, and secondly, by changing the grain size through annealing crystallization. The uniaxial tension tests were performed on an electronic universal material testing machine, in which a linear CCD based visual extensometer was used to measure deformation. The results show that the tensile strength decreases with decreasing specimen width or increasing surface-to-volume ratio. The tensile strength decreases with decreasing grain size for grain sizes larger than the specimen thickness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

777-782

Citation:

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Geiger, M. Kleiner, R. Eckstein: Microforming. Annals of the CIRP Vol. 50(2) (2001) p.445.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)62991-6

Google Scholar

[2] M. Geiger, M. Kleiner, M. Tolazzi: Metal forming ensures innovation and future in europe. Proceeding of the 8 th ICTP, (2005), p.447.

Google Scholar

[3] T. A. Kals, R. Eckstein: Miniaturization in sheet metal working. Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 103 (2000), p.95.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00391-5

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Saotome, A. Itoh, S. Amada: Supperplastic micro forming of double gear for milli-machines, Proceeding of the 4 th ICTP, (1993), p. (2000).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Miyazaki, H. Fujita, H. Hiraka: Effect of specimen size on the flow stress of rod specimens of polycrystalline Cu-Al-Alloy, Scripta Met. Vol. 13 (6) (1979), p.447.

DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(79)90067-x

Google Scholar

[6] L. V. Rvaulea, A. M. Goijaerts, L. E. Govaert, F. P. T. Baaijens: Size effects in the processing of thin metal sheets. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Vol. 115 (2001), p.44.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00770-1

Google Scholar

[7] L. V. Raulea, L. E. Govaert, F. P. Baaijens: Grain and specimen size effect in processing metal sheets. Proceeding of the 6 th ICTP, (1999), p.939.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Eckstein, U. Engel: Behavior of the grain structure in micro sheet metal working, Metal Forming 2000, (2000), p.453.

Google Scholar

[9] T. A. Kals, R. Eckstein: Miniaturization in sheet metal working. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Vol. 103 (2000), p.95.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00391-5

Google Scholar

[10] U. Engel, A. Messner, M. Geiger: Advanced concept for the FE-simulation of metal forming processes for the production of microparts, Proceeding of the 5 th ICTP, (1996), p.903.

Google Scholar

[11] U. Engel, S. Geissdoerfer, M. Geiger: Simulation of microforming process-an advanced approach applying a mesoscopic model, Proceeding of the 8 th ICTP, (2005), p.447.

Google Scholar

[12] J. F. Michel, P. Picart: Size effects on the constitutive behaviour for brass in sheet metal forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Vol. 141 (2003), p.439.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00570-3

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Saotome, K. Yasuda and H. Kaga: Microdeep drawability of very thin sheet steels. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Vol. 113 (2001), p.641.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00626-4

Google Scholar