Modeling of Material Removal Rate in Two-Dimensional Ultrasonic Grinding Complex Ceramics

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the machining pattern, mechanics of material removal and theory of micro-indentation, in previous studies the models of material removal rate of hard-brittle materials was discussed through the relatively influencing factors of machining parameters from various aspects, reflecting the research advances on mechanics of material removal of hard-brittle materials. However, those models of material removal rate have limitations, which results from impercipient theory of fracture of new kinks of materials, randomicity of practical machining process, inappropriate assumptions and simplification of the machining conditions and so on. In this work firstly, previous models of material removal rate of hard-brittle materials machining with ultrasonic assistance were reviewed briefly. Subsequently, the models of material removal rate of complex ceramics machining with two-dimensional ultrasonic vibration assistance were established based on fracture theory of micro- indentation in fracture regime and plastic removal mechanics in ductile regime respectively. The material removal rate is affected not only by the properties of material and machining parameters, but also by the character of grinding wheel and parameters of ultrasonic vibration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 359-360)

Pages:

431-435

Citation:

Online since:

November 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Zhao and et al: Key Eng Mater., Vol. 259 (2004), p.239.

Google Scholar

[2] M.C. Shaw: Microtechnic, Vol. 10 (1956), p.257.

Google Scholar

[3] G.E. Miller: J Appl Phys, Vol. 28/2 (1957), p.149.

Google Scholar

[4] L.D. Rosenberg and et al.: Ultrasonic Cutting (Consultant Bureau, New York 1964).

Google Scholar

[5] G.S. Kainth, A. Nandy and K. Singh: Int J Mach Tools Design and Research, Vol. 19 (1979), p.33.

Google Scholar

[6] E.V. Nair and A. Ghosh: Int J Prod Res, Vol. 23 (1985), p.731.

Google Scholar

[7] Z.Y. Wang and K.P. Rajurkar: J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME, Vol. 118 (1996), p.376.

Google Scholar

[8] T.C. Lee and C.W. Chan: J Mater Process Technol, Vol. 71 (1997), p.195.

Google Scholar

[9] Z.J. Pei, D. Prabhakar, P.M. Ferreira and M. Haselkorn: Trans. ASME, Vol. 117 (1995), p.142.

Google Scholar

[10] B. Zhao and et al: Key Eng Mater., Vol. 291 (2005), p.45.

Google Scholar

[11] A.G. Evans and T.R. Wilshaw: Acta Metallurgica (Pergamon Press, Great Britain 1976).

Google Scholar

[12] M. Komaraih and P.N. Reddy: Int J Mach Tols Manuface, Vol. 33 (1993), p.495.

Google Scholar

[13] T.G. Bifano, T.A. Dow and R.O. Scattergood: J Eng Ind Trans ASME, Vol. 113 (1991), p.184.

Google Scholar