In Vitro Behavior of Two Distinct Titanium Surfaces Obtained by Anodic Oxidation

Emanuel Santos; Neide K. Kuromoto; Doris M. Campos; Irineu Mazzaro; Gloria Dulce  de Almeida Soares

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.361-363.669

Paper Titles

Development of a Bioactive Surface on a Co-Cr-Mo Alloy during Investment Casting or Heat Treatment
p.653

Calcium Titanate Reaction Layers on TiAl6V4 Implants
p.657

Newly Formed Bone around Implanted New Titanium Alloy: Ti-15%Zr-4%Nb-4%Ta
p.661

Designed Solution to Coat Titanium Sheets with Octacalcium Phosphate
p.665

In Vitro Behavior of Two Distinct Titanium Surfaces Obtained by Anodic Oxidation
p.669

Characterization of Titanium Oxide Thin Films Produced by Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation for Biomedical Implants
p.673

Biocompatibility of Titanium Based Implants with Diamond-Like Carbon Coatings Produced by Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation and Deposition
p.677

Improvement of Apatite-Forming Ability of Tantalum Metal by CaCl₂ Treatment
p.681

Gelatin Immobilization on Titanium Surface by Gamma Irradiation
p.685

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 361-363In Vitro Behavior of Two Distinct Titanium...

In Vitro Behavior of Two Distinct Titanium Surfaces Obtained by Anodic Oxidation

Abstract:

Two different Ti oxide films produced by anodic oxidation were submitted to in vitro bioactivity and cell culture tests. The oxide films were produced in 1.0M H2SO4/150V and 1.0M Na2SO4/100V. Surfaces were found to be homogeneous and rough, with the presence of pores. Both oxide films presented anatase and rutile phases. Ti oxide film produced in Na2SO4 was rougher than the film grown with H2SO4 and composed of a rutile-rich phase. Both films were constituted by TiO2 and Ti2O3 oxides. Despite the differences observed, after 7 days, a calcium phosphate layer was precipitated on both surfaces. Indeed, these two treatment conditions seem to be efficient to spread and attach osteoblast-like cells within 4h.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 361-363)

Pages:

669-672

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.361-363.669

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2007

Authors:

Emanuel Santos, Neide K. Kuromoto, Doris M. Campos, Irineu Mazzaro, Gloria Dulce de Almeida Soares

Keywords:

Anodic Oxidation, In Vitro Test, Oxide Films, Titanium (Ti)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] F.H. Jones, Surface Science Reports, Vol. 42 (2001), pp.75-205.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.T. Sul, C.B. Johansson, S. Petronis et al., Biomaterials, Vol. 23 (2002), pp.491-501.

Google Scholar

[3] N.K. Kuromoto, R.A. Simao and G.A. Soares, Materials Characterization, Vol. 58 (2007), pp.114-121.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Kokubo, H.M. Kim, M. Kawashita et al., Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine, Vol. 15 (2004), pp.99-107.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Anselme, M. Bigerelle, B. Noel et al., Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 49 (2000), pp.155-166.

Google Scholar

[6] M.C. de Andrade, M.S. Sader, M.R.T. Filgueiras et al., Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Medicine, Vol. 11 (2000), pp.751-755.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1008984030540

Google Scholar

[7] B.C. Yang, M. Uchida, H.M. Kim et al., Biomaterials, Vol. 25 (2004), pp.1003-1010.

Google Scholar

[8] T.Y. Xiong, X.Y. Cui, H.M. Kim et al., Bioceramics 16, Vol. 254-2 (2004), pp.375-378.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Jonasova, F.A. Muller, A. Helebrant et al., Biomaterials, Vol. 25 (2004), pp.1187-1194. AAAA B B B B AAAA B B B B C C C C.

Google Scholar