Cytotoxicity and Adhesion Evaluation of Nanothickness Ca/P-Based Bioceramics Coated Titanium

Abstract:

Incorporation of bioceramics on the surface of dental implants has been utilized in an attempt to increase biological response of bone to materials. This paper reports the in vitro biological evaluation of Ca/P-based nanothickness bioceramic coated alumina-blasted/acid-etched titanium implants (AB/AE nanotite implant) and compare its performance to the untreated and uncoated implants, Ca/P-based nanothickness bioceramic coated untreated implants (untreated nanotite implant), alumina-blasted/acid-etched titanium implants (AB/AE implant) and hydroxyapatite plasma-sprayed implants (PSHA Implant). Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts were used to asses the cytocompatibility of implant materials according to ISO-10993-5 protocols. Osteoblasts from Balb/c femurs seeded onto different implant surfaces showed the effect of surface topography and chemistry on cell adhesion. The results showed that all implants were not cytotoxic and that PSHA and AB/AE nanotite implants favored osteoblasts adhesion.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 396-398)
• Pages: 319-322
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.396-398.319
• Online since: October 2008
• Authors: Caroline M. Ramirez, Paulo Guilherme Coelho, José Mauro Granjeiro
• Keywords: Adhesion, Bioceramics Coated Titanium, Coated Titanium, Cytotoxicity

References

[1] D. Buser, N. Broggini, M. Wieland, R. K. Schenk, A. J. Denzer, D. L. Cochran, B. Hoffmann, A. Lussi and S. G. Steinemann: J. Dent Res Vol 83 (2004), pp.318-24.

DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300704

[2] A. Ince, N. Schutze, C. Hendrich, R. Thull, J. Eulert and J. F. Loh: J Arthroplasty (2008) Feb 27. [Epub ahead of print].

[3] H. Q. Nguyen, D. A. Deporter, R. M. Pilliar, N. Valiquette and R. Yakubovich: Biomaterials Vol. 25 (2004), p.865.

[4] C. Chenglin, Z. Jingchuan, Y. Zhongda and L. Pinghua: Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. A 316 (2001), p.205.

[5] ISO 10993-5. Biological evaluation of medical devices. art 5: Tests for cytotoxicity: In vitro methods. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva(1999).

[6] C. Yusuf: Biotechnol. Adv Vol. 24 (2006), p.352.

[7] Y. Tamaki, K. Sasaki, A. Sasaki, Y. Takakubo, H. Hasegawa, T. Ogino, Y.T. Konttinen, J. Salo and M. Takagi: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Vol. 84 (2008), pp.191-204.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30861

[8] T.A. Schildhauer, E. Peter, G. Muhr and M. Köller: J Biomed Mater Res A. (2008) Feb 19.

[9] R. Lenz, W. Mittelmeier, D. Hansmann, R. Brem, P. Diehl, A. Fritsche and R. Bader: J Biomed Mater Res A. (2008) Apr 22. [Epub ahead of print].

[10] S. Makihira, Y. Mine, E. Kosaka and H. Nikawa: Titanium surface roughness accelerates RANKL-dependent differentiation in the osteoclast precursor cell line, RAW264. 7. Dent Mater J. 2007 Sep; 26(5): 739-45.

DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.739

[11] H. Zeng, J. Du, Q. Zeng, Y. Liu and X. Guo. J Tongji Med Univ Vol 19 (1999), pp.131-4.

[12] K. Kieswetter, Z. Schwartz, T.W. Hummert, D.L. Cochran, J., D.D. Dean and et al: J Biomed Mater ResVol. 32 (1996), pp.55-63.

[13] K. Anselme and M. Bigerelle: J Mater Sci Mater Med. 17 (2006), pp.471-9.

[14] F. Lüthen, R. Lange, P. Becker, J. Rychly, U. Beck and J.G. Nebe: Biomaterials 26 (2005), pp.2423-40.

[15] P.M., J. Harle, V. Salih, R., I. Olsen, F.H. and M. Tonetti: Bone 35 (2004), pp.124-33.

[16] M. Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, R. Gutwald, N.C. Gellrich, U. Hubner, and R. Schmelzeisen: J Mater Sci Mater Med Vol. 16 (2005), pp.57-66.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-005-6447-z