Optimising the Design of Adhesively Bonded Joints

Abstract:

The effect of varying certain geometric and material property parameter on the stiffness of bonded joints has been investigated for both single overlap joints and for coach (T peel) joints. An understanding of bonded joint behaviour under load has been gained from this parametric study and this insight has been used to fashion some design guidelines aimed at optimising these parameters to increase joint stiffness. To develop these design guidelines, laboratory tensile testing of single overlap joints and coach joints, manufactured from steel and aluminium and bonded with either an epoxide or a methacrylate adhesive, was utilised to establish joint stiffness. For single overlap joints, joint stiffness was found to be sensitive to changes in adherend thickness, adherend’s Young’s modulus, bondline thickness and overlap length but indifferent to changes in adhesive material properties, unsupported length and joint width. Coach joints, stiffness was found to be sensitive to changes in adherend material, adherend thickness, fill ratio and outer radius and adhesive material. It must be recognised that the Design of Experiments technique, used to analyse the coach joint samples may have masked some of the effects caused by changes to joint parameters.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 410-411)
• Pages: 127-139
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.127
• Online since: March 2009
• Authors: Ian Pearson
• Keywords: Adhesive, Bond, Joint

References

[1] Lees W. Adhesives and the engineer. Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, UK, (1989). ISBN 085298703X.

[2] Hart-Smith L. Designing to minimize peel stresses in adhesively-bonded joints. McDonnell Douglas Paper 7389, (1983).

[3] Pearson I. A Method for the Inclusion of Adhesively Bonded Joints in the Finite Element Analysis of Automobile Structures. PhD Thesis University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. (2006).

[4] Wooley G R and Carver D R. Stress Concentration Factors for Bonded Joints. Journal of Aircraft, 8(10). (1971).

[5] Li G, Lee-Sullivan P and Thring R W. &onlinear Finite Element Analysis of Stress and Strain Distributions across the Adhesive Thickness in Composite Single-Lap Joints. Composite Structures, 46(4), pp.395-403. Dec (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(99)00106-3

[6] Goland M and Reissner E. The Stresses in Cemented Joints. Journal of Applied Mechanics, Trans ASME, 66, p A17-A27. (1944).

DOI: 10.1115/1.4009336

[7] Hart-Smith L J. Adhesive Bonded Single Lap Joints. NASA Technical Report CR-112236. (1973).

[8] Hart-Smith L J. Further Developments in the Design & analysis of adhesive-Bonded Structural Joints, NASA CR-112235, (1973).

[9] Bigwood D A and Crocombe A D. Elastic Analysis and Engineering Design Formulae for Bonded Joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 9(4), pp.229-242, Oct (1989).

DOI: 10.1016/0143-7496(89)90066-3

[10] Hinopoulos G and Broughton W R. Evaluation of the T Peel Joint Using the Finite Element Method. NPL Report CMMT (A) 207, (1999).

[11] Montgomery D C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 5th edition, (2001).

[12] Taguchi G and Clausing D. System of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Costs. UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications: American Supplier Institute, (1987).

[13] McGregor I, Nardini D, Gao Y and Meadows D. The development of a joint design approach for aluminium automotive structures. SAE 922112, (1992).

DOI: 10.4271/922112