An Efficient Way to Characterize the Fatigue Crack Growth Based on Numerical Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

The behavior of plasticity induced fatigue crack closure (PICC) in middle tension specimen was analyzed by the elastic-plastic finite element method. For the constant-K (CK) loading cases, the opening stress intensity factor are independent of crack length. The level of increases with the maximal applied stress intensity factor for given load ratio and increases with for fixed . The in plane strain state is much smaller than that in plane stress state. The results under CK loadings can be deduced to constant amplitude cyclic loading case during which the load ratio, maximal load level, crack length and specimen thickness are all the factors affecting the crack closure effect. The phenomena revealed in the analysis are beneficial in understanding the driving force mechanism of the fatigue crack growth.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 417-418)

Pages:

653-656

Citation:

Online since:

October 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Elber W. The significance of fatigue crack closure. Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486, 1971: 230-242.

DOI: 10.1520/stp26680s

Google Scholar

[2] Fleck N. A., Newman J. C. Analysis of crack closure under plane-strain conditions. Mechanics of Fatigue Crack Closure, ASTM STP 982, 1988: 319-341.

DOI: 10.1520/stp27218s

Google Scholar

[3] McClung R. C., Thacker B. H., Roy S. Finite element visualization of fatigue crack closure in plane-stress and plane-strain. Int. J. Fract., 1991, 50: 27-49.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00035167

Google Scholar

[4] Pommier S. Plane strain crack closure and cyclic hardening, Engng. Fract. Mech., 2002, 69: 25-44.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(01)00061-3

Google Scholar

[5] Solanki K., Daniewicz S. R., Newman Jr. J. C. Finite element analysis of plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure: An overview, Engng. Fract. Mech., 2004, 71: 149-171.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00099-7

Google Scholar

[6] Li Y. Z., He J., Zhang Z. P., Wang L. Characterizing fatigue crack closure by numerical analysis. Advanced Materials Research, 2008, 33-37: 273-278.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.33-37.273

Google Scholar

[7] González-Herrera A., Zapatero J. Influence of minimum element size to determine crack closure stress by the finite element method. Engng. Fract. Mech., 2005, 72: 337-355.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.04.002

Google Scholar

[8] Zapatero J., Moreno B., González-Herrera A. Fatigue crack closure determination by means of finite element analysis, Engng. Fract. Mech., 2008, 75: 41-57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.020

Google Scholar

[9] Schijve J. Some formulas for crack opening stress level. Engng. Fract. Mech., 1981, 14: 461-5.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(81)90034-5

Google Scholar

[10] Newman Jr. J. C. A crack opening stress equation for fatigue crack growth, Int. J. Fract., 1984, 24: R131-R135. Fig. 5 Effect of R and Kmax on crack closure.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00020751

Google Scholar