Residual Stresses Assessment in Coated Materials: Complementarity between Neutron and X-Ray Techniques

Article Preview

Abstract:

The residual stress (RS) status induced in the substrate of coated materials by the coating process plays frequently a major role in lending the component’s characteristics. RS assessment can give, thus, a substantial contribution in justifying different cases of failure or else bad performance of coated components due to e.g. the coating delamination or to other occurrences which are not simply interpretable via the conventional mechanical tests or microstructure analyses. The adoption of both neutron diffraction (ND) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques has revealed its usefulness in assessing the RS values in proximity of the coating interface area, respectively, without any layer removal or hole drilling at the extreme surface. In this paper, some real cases of RS determination in coated materials by using these techniques and exploiting their complementarity are described. ND, in particular, is very suitable for crucial applications, where a much different stress situation than that assessed by XRD could be present at some depth below the surface. The results achieved can yield trends adoptable in monitoring of the coating features.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

259-262

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Rogante, P. Mikula and M. Vrána, Surf. Coat. Techn., 204 (2009), p.650.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Scrivani, S. Ianelli, A. Rossi, R. Groppetti, F. Casadei and G. Rizzi, Wear 250 (2001), p.107.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00621-4

Google Scholar

[3] A.A. Samad, E. Lugscheider, K. Bobzin and M. Maes, in: Proc. Int. Thermal Spray Conf. 2004, Protective Coatings against Wear and Erosion I, DVS-Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf (2004), p.1.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Tani and A. Nakahira, in: Proc. Int. Thermal Spray Conf. 2004, Applications V, DVS-Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf (2004), p.18.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Winkler, F. Bültmann, S. Hartmann and H. Burkard, in: Proc. Int. Thermal Spray Conf. 2003, edited by C. Moreau and B. Marple, ASM International, USA (2003).

DOI: 10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2003p0149

Google Scholar

[6] M.R. Dorfman, Adv. Mater. Processes, 160/10 (2002), p.66.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Li, A. Gouldstone and S. Sampath, in: Proc. Int. Thermal Spray Conf. 2004, DVS-Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf (2004).

Google Scholar

[8] B.S. Yilbas, A.F.M. Arif and M.A. Gondal, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 164/165 (2005), p.954.

Google Scholar

[9] T.C. Totemeier, R.N. Wright and W.D. Swank, Metall. Mat. Trans. A, 35A (2004), p.1807.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Rogante, in: Proc. 1st Italian Workshop for Industry Industrial Applications of Neutron Techniques, Civitanova Marche, Italy, 12-14 June 2008, edited by Rogante Engineering (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] I. C. Noyan and J. B. Cohen, in: Residual Stress - Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, Springer-Verlag, NY (1987).

Google Scholar

[12] M. A. M. Bourke, Ph. D. thesis, Imperial College, London (1990).

Google Scholar

[13] M. Rogante, Ph. D. thesis, University of Bologna (1999).

Google Scholar

[14] A.J. Allen, M.T. Hutchings, C.G. Windsor and C. Andreani, Adv. Phys., 34 (1985), p.445.

Google Scholar

[15] B.D. Cullity and S.R. Stock, in: Elements of X-ray Diffraction, edited by Prentice Hall (2001).

Google Scholar

[16] J. Pina, A. Dias and J.L. Lebrun, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 347 (2003), p.21.

Google Scholar

[17] G. Bolelli, L. Lusvarghi, T. Varis, E. Turunen, M. Leoni, P. Scardi, C. L. Azanza-Ricardo and M. Barletta, Surf. Coat. Technol., 202/19 (2008), p.4810.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.04.066

Google Scholar

[18] M. Gelfi, E. Bontempi, R. Roberti and L.E. Depero, Acta Materialia, 52 (2004), p.583.

Google Scholar

[19] N.R. Shankar, H. Herman, S.P. Singhal and C.C. Berndt, Thin Solid Films, 119/2, (1984), p.159.

Google Scholar

[20] M. Ceretti , H. Michaud, M. Perrin and A. Lodini, Exper. Techn., 19/3 (1995), p.17.

Google Scholar

[21] A. Sahiner, D. Wittmer and M. Sweeney, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B, 133 (1997), p.73.

Google Scholar

[22] O. Kesler, J. Matejicek, S. Sampath, S. Suresh, T. Gnaeupel-Herold, P.C. Brand and H.J. Prask, Mat. Sci. Eng. A257 (1998), p.215.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(98)00860-0

Google Scholar

[23] J. Dubský, J. Matějíček, H.J. Prask and T. Gnäupel-Herold, Mat. Sci. Forum, 404-407 (2002), p.419.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.404-407.419

Google Scholar

[24] T. Keller, N. Margadant, T. Pirling, M.J. Riegert-Escribano and W. Wagner, Mat. Sci. & Eng. A, 373 (2004), p.33.

Google Scholar

[25] L. Li, A. Vaidya, T. Streibl, S. Sampath, A. Gouldstone, V. Luzin and H.J. Prask, Mat. Sci. Forum, 490-491 (2005), p.607.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.490-491.607

Google Scholar

[26] R. Ahmed, H. Yu, S. Stewart, L. Edwards and J.R. Santisteban, J. Trib. 129/2 (2007), p.411.

Google Scholar