How to Evaluate the Economic Value Added of Innovative Interface Technologies in a Booming Cyber Commerce Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Beginning in the 21st century, e-business enterprises need to take vigorous tactics in facing greater challenges in a booming cyber commerce era. In today’s e-business environment, innovative interface technologies change with each passing day, customers’ (users’) satisfaction are more and more discerning, and market demands can fluctuate unpredictably. While facing constant changes in the lower-profit and high customer-service cyber commerce environment, it is important to know how to break through the current Information Technology (IT) industrial situation, maintain the enterprises’ owned advantage and continuously make a profit under a booming transition. In this research, nineteen sub-criteria are categorized into five factors (criteria) by the measurement of factor analysis. Three basic types of innovative business websites (portals, cyber commerce and social community) in an e-business environment are then evaluated by nineteen assessable criteria of five characteristics of innovation interface technology through the use of the Analytical Network Process (ANP) approach. The specific feature of the ANP model is to establish a pairwise comparative matrix and furthermore, to calculate the priority vector weights (eigenvector) of each assessable characteristic, criteria and sub-criteria. The factor analysis can utilize more measure matrix to benefit the deviation of ANP approach due to less data from expert’s opinions. Additionally, in the content, the analytical hierarchical relations are definitely expressed in four levels among each characteristic of innovative interface technology (IIT), criterion and sub-criteria. Moreover, based on the empirical analysis, the enterprises are able to choose the best potential business website with highest economic value added (EVA) through this research in order to maximize financial profits and benefits from an innovative perspective. Finally, some suggestions for managers and researchers are inductively formed to further determine the best development of innovative interface technologies in a thriving cyber commerce environment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 467-469)

Pages:

1006-1011

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ancarani, F., Shankar, V., Price levels and price dispersion across and within multiple retailer channels. Further evidence and extension, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 32 (2) (2004), pp.176-87.

DOI: 10.1177/0092070303261464

Google Scholar

[2] Ancarani F, Shankar V., Symbian: Customer interaction through collaboration and competition in a convergent industry, Journal of Inteactive Marketing, Vol. 17 (1) (2003), pp.56-76.

DOI: 10.1002/dir.10048

Google Scholar

[3] Amit, R., and C. Zott, Value creation in e-business, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22(6/7) (2001), pp.493-520.

DOI: 10.1002/smj.187

Google Scholar

[4] Chesbrough, H, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003).

DOI: 10.5465/amp.2006.20591014

Google Scholar

[5] Driva H., Pawar K.S. and Menon, U., Measuring product development performance in manufacturing organizations, International Journal of Production Economic, Vol. 66 (2001), pp.147-159.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(99)00007-9

Google Scholar

[6] Gordon, M. E. & K. D. Turner, Consumer attitudes towards internet advertising: a social perspective, International Marketing Review, Vol. 14(5) (1997), pp.362-375.

DOI: 10.1108/02651339710184316

Google Scholar

[7] Greg Linden, Kenneth L. Kraemer, Jason Dedrick, Technological interweavement: a means of achieving innovation success, R&D Management, Vol. 22(4) (2007), pp.359-375.

Google Scholar

[8] Hussein Al-Yaseen, Tillal Eldabi, David Y. Lees, Ray J. Paul, Operational Use evaluation of IT investments: An investigation into potential benefits, European Journal of Operational Research, 1000~1011 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.001

Google Scholar

[9] Saaty, Thomas L., Multi-criteria decision making: the analytic hierarchy process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA (1998).

Google Scholar

[10] Saaty, Thomas L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA (1996).

Google Scholar

[11] Sarkis J., Evaluating environment conscious business practices, European Journal of Operational Research, Voll. 107 (1) (1998) , pp.159-74.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00160-4

Google Scholar