Residual Strength and Failure Criterion of PP Thermoplastic Honeycomb Sandwich Subjected to Low Velocity Impact

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presented the effect of constituent materials on impact damage and strength reduction of sandwich structure, composed of laminated woven E-glass facesheets and polypropylene thermoplastic honeycomb core. Effect of low-velocity impact was the main interest in a variety of layered configurations. Compression after impact (CAI) has been carried out to determine the residual strength of impacted sandwich structures. Three different thicknesses of core of 20, 40 and 60mm subjected to three different levels of impact energy of 15, 30 and 45J were investigated. Impact response of the panel was recorded and analyzed in terms of peak load, indentation, energy absorbed and time. A profile analysis using optical 3D surfaces profiler was carried out to attain the indentation depth and damage area of the samples. The tested samples were then sectioned into halves to capture the failure mode or damaged sequence of the polypropylene thermoplastic honeycomb core. The dominant failure modes of the core indicated that polypropylene thermoplastic honeycomb core is a high strength material which can absorb higher impact energy and retain a higher degree of structural integrity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 471-472)

Pages:

646-651

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Md. A Bhuiyan, M.V. Hosur, S. Jeelani: submitted to Composite: Part B (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] M.V. Hosur, A.A. Mohammed, S. Zainuddin, S. Jeelani: Mater. Sci. and Engineering A Vol. 498 (2008), pp.100-109.

Google Scholar

[3] Mehmet Aktas, Cesim Atas, Bulent Murat Icten, Ramazan Karakuzu: Comp. Struc. Vol. 87 (2009) pp.307-313.

Google Scholar

[4] Shaw M. Lee, Thomas K. Tsotsis. Comp. Sci. and Tech. Vol. 60 (2000) pp.1147-1159.

Google Scholar

[5] Ik Hyeon Choi. Comp. Struc. Vol. 75 (2006) pp.582-586.

Google Scholar

[6] Bruno Castanie, Yulfian Aminanda, Christophe Bouvet, Jean-Jacques Barrau. Comp. struc. Vol. 86 (2008) pp.243-250.

Google Scholar

[7] A. R Othman, D. C Barton. Comp. Struc. Vol. 85 (2008) pp.126-138.

Google Scholar

[8] Ki-Weon Kang. Heung Seob Kim, Man Sig Kim, Jung-Kyu Kim. Mater. Sci. and Engineering A: Vol. 483-484 (2008) pp.333-335.

Google Scholar

[9] Joris Leijten, Harald E.N. Bersee, Otto K. Bergsma, Adriaan Beukers. submitted to Composite: Part A (2008).

Google Scholar