Geometrical Modeling of the Sheet Metal Parts in the Incremental Shrinking Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Shrinking is an incremental forming process and can be carried out using a driving machine, so called “Kraftformer”. It needs an upper and a lower shrinking tool, each of which has two moveable jaws as contact and force transform units. During every forming operation the tools clamp the metal sheet, so that the vertical forces from the upper tool are switched by the leverages inside the tools into the horizontal directions. The moveable jaws are practiced by the horizontal forces to compress the metal sheet. The shrinking of the metal sheet brings out the different three-dimensional forms. As a traditional manual forming method, economical productions can’t be reached for individualized sheet metal parts to achieve the customer’s demands. Hence, it is proposed to automate this forming process to reduce the manual work. The production strategies are to be deduced from the manual shrinking process. A direct way to get them is to simulate the forming process in a FEM-software environment. But within such a FEM-simulation it can take about even one hour only just to finish one forming step. Furthermore, an analytical modeling of the shrinking can’t be realized because of its complex procedures such as variation of contact conditions, material hardening. However, a pure geometric model can be established to demonstrate the change of the 3D-forms of the sheet metal parts. The respective forming parameters can be identified through the experiments. The simulation can take place only in a few seconds. This paper provides general information about the application of the manufacturing method and with it the qualification of shrinking as a manufacturing concept for the production of individualized sheet metal products.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

509-515

Citation:

Online since:

March 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Hoffmann and R. Petry, in: World Congress on Mass Customization and Personalization, Hong Kong, September (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] N. N.: Vintage skill, Mach. Tool Rev. 63 (1975) 367, pp.117-118.

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Yang, M. Markert, D. Scherer , M. Golle, S. Weber, H. Hoffmann, B. Lohmann, T. C. Lueth , in: IEEE International Conference on Distributed Human-Machine Systems, Athens, Greece, 9-12 March (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Yang and B. Lohmann, in: 6th Vienna International Conference on Mathematical Modeling MATHMOD 2009, Vienna, Austria, February (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Yang, M. Markert, D. Scherer , M. Golle, S. Weber, H. Hoffmann, B. Lohmann, T. C. Lueth , in: IFAC Workshop on Manufacturing Modeling, Management and Control, Budapest, Hungary, 14-16 November (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Yang, S. Bürger, B. Lohmann, in: Automatisierungstechnik, Heft 8, S. 377-385 , Jahrgang 57 (2009).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Scherer, Z. Yang, S. Vogt, M. Golle, in: 7th CIRP International Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering (CIRP ICME '10), Gulf of Naples, Italy, 16-18 June (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Yang, D. Scherer, H. Hoffmann, F. Echtler, G. Klinker, in: CARV 2009, 3rdInternational Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production, Munich, Germany, 5-7 October (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] Z. Yang, F. Echtler, D. Scherer, H. Hoffmann, G. Klinker, M. Golle, in: Automation of Driving Process in Copying manual Manipulations, 43rd CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Vienna, 25. - 28. May (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] GOM mbH., www. gom. com/metrology-systems/system-overview/atos. html (2010).

Google Scholar