Calculation of Services Value for Grassland Ecosystem in HulunBuir City

Article Preview

Abstract:

Calculating the value of ecosystem services may improve economic efficiency and play an important role in protecting ecosystems.The grassland ecosystem of HulunBuir city is an important component of ecology security system in Northeast China and is the typical belt transect of International Geosphere Biosphere Programme global change study. In this study, net primary productivity (NPP), as an improtant ecological parameter, was used to estmate the services value. Considering the characteristic of satellite imagery, it is difficult to calculate some functions. So we calculated the services value from four aspects, including soil erosion control, water conservation, direct production and gas regulation. The total services value of grassland ecosystem was estimated in RMB to be aproximately 18.47×109Yuan in 2006 (Chinese currency, 7.78 Yuan=US$1), the average economic value of unit area was 15.4×104Yuan/km2. The direct production value was 1.23×109Yuan/year; and the contribution rate to total value was 6.66%. Indirect services value was 17.24×109Yuan/year, and the contribution rate to total value was 93.34%. Indirect services value was far more than direct production value. For the indirect services value, the water regulation value was the maximum, 9.09×109Yuan/year. Gas regulation value was 5.25×109Yuan/year, contributing 28.42% to the total value.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 474-476)

Pages:

1611-1616

Citation:

Online since:

April 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.M. Adams and H. Faure: Increases in terrestrial carbon storage from the last glacial maximum to the present. Nature , vol. 348(1990), p.71.

DOI: 10.1038/348711a0

Google Scholar

[2] A. Richmond and K . Robert: 2007. Valuing ecosystem services: A shadow price for net primary production. Ecological econimics . vol. 64(2007), p.454.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.009

Google Scholar

[3] N.J. Beaumonta and M.C. Austena: Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin . vol. 54(2008), p.253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003

Google Scholar

[4] R. Costanza and R. Groot: The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature vol. 387 (1997), p.253.

Google Scholar

[5] R.S. De and M.A. Wilson: A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics . vol. 41(2002), p.393.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7

Google Scholar

[6] S. Engel ,S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder: 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economic vol. (2008), p.663.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

Google Scholar

[7] S. Farber, R. Costanza: Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience. vol. 56(2006), p.121.

Google Scholar

[8] C.B. Field , CM. Malmstron: Global net primary production: Combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote sensing of Environment. vol. 51(1995), p.74.

DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-v

Google Scholar

[9] I.M. Gren, K.H. Groth and M. Sylen: Economic values of Danube Floodplains. Journal of environmental management. vol. 45(1995), p.333.

DOI: 10.1006/jema.1995.0080

Google Scholar

[10] E.R. Hunt: Relationship between woody biomass and PAR conversion efficiency for estimating net primary production from NDVI. Int. J. Remote Sensing, vol. 55(1994), p.1725.

DOI: 10.1080/01431169408954203

Google Scholar

[11] M.C. Liu, D.Q. Li and Y.M. Wen : Function and value of water-holding in Sanjingyuan region. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, vol. 14(2006), p.407.

Google Scholar

[12] Y.G. Liu, P.H. Peng, W.D. Chen: Study on the function of vegetation in water conservation based on GIS technology in the upper Yangtze river. Journal of Anhui Agri. Sci. vol. 34(2006), p.3323.

Google Scholar

[13] Y.Z. Pan, P.J. Shi and Zhu W. Q: Measurement of ecological capital of Chinese terrestrial ecosystem based on remote sensing. Science in China Ser. D Earth Sciences, vol. 34(2004), p.375.

DOI: 10.1360/03yd0264

Google Scholar

[14] W.J. Parton and D.S. Ojma: Environmental change in rangelands: assessment using models. Climatic Change. vol. 28(2004), p.111.

Google Scholar

[15] S.W. Running and J.C. Coughlan: A general model of ecosystem processes for regional applications. Hydrologic balance, canoy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecological Modelling, vol. 42(1998), p.125.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(88)90112-3

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Xiao and G.D. Xie: The function and economic value of soil conservation of ecosystems in Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica. Vol. 23(2003), p.2367.

Google Scholar