Investigating Vocational High School Students’ Cognitive Load of Infusing Nanotechnology into Electronics Subjects

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purposes of this study were to develop a novel material which was infused nanotechnology into electronics subjects to vocational high school students’with no background in nanotechnology. And then to investigate the cognitive load of them, after they learnedthenovel curriculum pattern. The researchers began todevelop a novel electricsmaterial which is consisted of four chapters includedseven sectionsby experts of electronics, nanotechnology and vocational education. Theexperimentswere conducted by using PPT pedagogy to teach the nanotechnology infused into electronicscourse between twodepartments ofvocational high schools. After four months and four times in one month experimental teaching, cognitive load scale questionnaireand K of KAP scale questionnairewere examined.Finally, the applications of this materialare illustrated that the performances of K scores weresignificant differencebetween electronic engineering department and information engineering department.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 474-476)

Pages:

1825-1829

Citation:

Online since:

April 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Greenberg. A., (2009). Integrating Nanoscience into the Classroom: Perspectives on Nanoscience Education Projects. American Chemical Society. 3 (4), 762-769.

DOI: 10.1021/nn900335r

Google Scholar

[2] http: /www. tve. edu. tw/data/0718/first part -the challenge of vocational educatio. htm.

Google Scholar

[3] Foster LE. Nanotechnology. New York: Prentice Hall; (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] Tománek, P. (2006). Nanotechnology and Nanophotonics interactive course for Electrical Engineering undergraduate students. Proceeding for the Symposium on Photonics Technologies for 7th Framework Program. 374 -377.

Google Scholar

[5] Is Nanotechnology Ready for Primetime?JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst (4 January 2006) 98 (1): 9-11.

Google Scholar

[6] Van Der Stuyf R.R. , (2002)Scaffolding as a Teaching Strategy. Adolescent Learning and Development , Section 0500A - November 17.

Google Scholar

[7] Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer,J., & Pass, F. G. C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional design. Educational Psychologist Review, 10(3), 251-296.

Google Scholar

[8] Paas, F., Renkl, A., &Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.

DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep3801_1

Google Scholar

[9] Tomasil, J.H., Jin, S., Hamers, R.J., & Moore, J.W. (2010). Design and Initial Evaluation of an Online Nanoscience Course for Teachers. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 48-67.

DOI: 10.1166/jne.2009.003

Google Scholar