Optimization of Goose Meat Composite Tender Agent by Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, the goose meat was used as raw material and the formula of composite tender agent was optimized by Response Surface Methodology. Goose breast meat were soaked with exogenous protease of plants, phosphate and Ca2+ for 3 hours at 2 °C. The influence of different composite tender agent on the water-holding capacity was examined by statistical response surface methodology (RSM). The result showed that papain 6.16 U/g, compound phosphate 0.308 % and calcium chloride 0.133 % was helpful to increase the tenderization of goose breast. The results of our study would be used to improve the tenderness of goose meat and increase economic efficiency of goose industry.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 480-481)

Pages:

1525-1529

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A.J. Maurer: Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, (2003), pp.4686-4689.

Google Scholar

[2] B. Gerelt, Y. Ikeuchi, T. Nishiumi and A. Suzuki: Meat Science, vol. 60 (2002), p.237–244.

DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(01)00126-7

Google Scholar

[3] Q. Chen, G. He, Y. Jiao and H. Ni: Food Chemistry, vol. 98 (2006), p.624–629.

Google Scholar

[4] J.S. Kim, F. Shahidi and M.S. Heu: Food Chemistry, vol. 93 (2005) p.243–249.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Berge, P. Ertbjerg, L. M. Larsen, T. Astruc, X. Vignon and A. J. Mùller: Meat Science, vol. 57 (2001), pp.347-357.

DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(00)00110-8

Google Scholar

[6] B. Gerelt, Y. Ikeuchi and A. Suzuki: Meat Science, vol. 56 (2000), pp.311-318.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Apichartsrangkoon: Food Chemistry, vol. 80 (2003), pp.55-60.

Google Scholar

[8] B. M. Naveena and S. K. Mendiratta: British Poultry Science. vol. 42 (2001), p.344–350.

Google Scholar

[9] J.L. Uma Maheswar Rao and T. Satyanarayana: Bioresource Technol Vol. 98 (2007), pp.345-352.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Kammoun, B. Naili and S. Bejar: Bioresource Technol Vol. 99 (2008) pp.5602-5609.

Google Scholar