Numerical Stress Intensity Factors Determination for Fabrication Defects in Coronary Stents

Article Preview

Abstract:

Objectives: Numerical stress intensity factors (SIFs) computation for several fabrication defect geometries in coronary stents. XFEM crack initiation and propagation was also performed. Methods: The model represents a self-expandable coronary stent, made from a shape memory alloy (L-605). Several flaw shapes are considered. The analysis was performed using the ABAQUS code. The loads and boundary conditions simulate the interaction between the blood vessels and stents, immediately after the angioplasty was performed. The mesh contains 3d stress hexahedral elements. For global stress and strain distributions, the model of a complete stent was used. For crack propagation analysis and SIF determination, the model represented a single segment of the stent. The stress intensity factors were computed using the contour integral method. Results and conclusions: The stress and strain fields highlight the negative effects of crack initiation and propagation on the residual life of the stent. Furthermore, by compromising the structural integrity of the stent, large strains may occur, thus increasing the risk of restenosis and further stenosis-related complications. The stress intensity factors indicate the most dangerous locations for the flaws (cracks), as well as the most dangerous geometries.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

718-721

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H.G. Beebe, J.L. Cronenwett, B.T. Katzen, D.C. Brewster, R.M. Green, Results of an aortic endograft trial: impact of device failure beyond 12 months, Journal of Vascular Surgery 33, 2001, S55–S63.

DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.111663

Google Scholar

[2] T.S. Jacobs, J. Won, E.C. Gravereaux, P.L. Faries, N. Morrissey, V.J. Teodorescu, Hollier, L.H. Holl, M.L. Marin, Mechanical failure of prosthetic human implants: a 10-year experience with aortic stent graft devices, Journal of Vascular Surgery 37, 2003, p.16.

DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.58

Google Scholar

[3] N. Chakfe, F. Dieval, G. Riepe, D. Mathieu, I. Zbali, F. Thaveau, C. Heintz, G. Kretz, B. Durand, Influence of the textile structure on the degradation of explanted aortic endoprostheses, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 27, 2004, p.33.

DOI: 10.1016/s1078-5884(03)00341-1

Google Scholar

[4] C. Lally, F. Dolan, P.J. Prendergast, Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis, Journal of Biomechanics 38, 2005, pp.1574-1581.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.022

Google Scholar

[5] F. Migliavacca, L. Petrini, P. Massarotti, S. Schievano, F. Auricchio, G. Dubini, Stainless and shape memory alloy coronary stents: a computational study on the interaction with the vascular wall, Biomechan Model Mechanobiol 2, 2004, p.205–217.

DOI: 10.1007/s10237-004-0039-6

Google Scholar

[6] F. Migliavacca, L. Petrini, M. Colombo, F. Auricchio, R. Pietrabissa, Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method, J Biomech 35 , 2002, p.803–811.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00033-7

Google Scholar

[7] W. Wu, W. -Q. Wang, D. -Z. Yang, M. Qi, Stent expansion in curved vessel and their interactions: a finite element analysis, Journal of Biomechanics 40, 2007, pp.2580-2585.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.11.009

Google Scholar