The Influence of Specimen Grips on the Measurement of Micro-Tensile Bond Strength to Human Dentin

Article Preview

Abstract:

To evaluate the effects of specimen grips on the measurement of the micro-tensile bond strength (mTBS) to dentin. Methods: Twelve extracted human molars were sectioned to expose mid-coronal dentin. Each surface was ground with 600-grit SiC paper. Four adhesives: Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply, USA), Contex (DMG, German), Adper Prompt (3M/ESPE, USA) and Clearfil S3 Bond (Kuraray, Japan) were applied to the polished surfaces followed by creation of composite buildups. After 24 hr storage in 37°C water, the teeth were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface to produce multiple beams of composite-bonded dentin, approximately 0.8 mm2 in cross-sectioned area. Half of the specimens were attached to testing grips A which did not contain positioning pins and another half were attached to the testing grips B which contained positioning pins. All specimens were tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Results: Specimens tested using the grips A presented lower mTBS than using the grips B (P<0.01). Many specimens tested using the grips A showed mix failure or cohesive failure within composite, and most of the failures were adhesive for specimens tested using the grips A. Conclusion: Specimen grips without positioning pins cannot accurately present mTBS and the grips with positioning pins can more accurately present mTBS.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

18-23

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.H. Pashley, H. Sano, B. Ciucchi, et al: Dent. Mater. Vol. 11 (1995), p.117.

Google Scholar

[2] D.H. Pashley, R.M. Carvalho, H. Sano, et al: J. Adhes. Dent. Vol. 1 (1999), p.299.

Google Scholar

[3] W.G. McDonough, J.M. Antonucci, J.M. He, et al: Biomaterials Vol. 23 (2002), p.3603.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Versluis, D. Tantbirojn, W.H. Douglas: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 76 (1997), p.1298.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Della Bona, R. van Noort: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 74 (1995), p.1591.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Sano, T. Shono, H. Sonoda, et al: Dent. Mater. Vol. 10(1994), p.236.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Leloup, W. D'Hoore,D. Bouter, et al: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 80 (2001), p.1605.

Google Scholar

[8] C.S. Fowler, M.L. Swartz, B.K. Moore, et al: Dent. Mater. Vol. 8 (1992), p.265.

Google Scholar

[9] H.E. Goodis, G.W. Marshall, J.M. White, et al: Dent. Mater. Vol. 9 (1993), p.79.

Google Scholar

[10] C. Prati, D.H. Pashley: Am. J. Dent. Vol. 5 (1992), p.33.

Google Scholar

[11] J. Perdigao, E.J. Swift, B.C. Cloe: Am. J. Dent. Vol. 6 (1993), p.61.

Google Scholar

[12] A.M. Diaz-Arnold, V.D. Williams, S.A. Aquilino: Oper. Dent. Vol. 15 (1990), p.71.

Google Scholar

[13] F.A. Rueggeberg: Dent. Mater. Vol. 7 (1991), p.2.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Oilo, E.K. Austrheim: Acta Odontol. Scand. Vol. 51 (1993), p.263.

Google Scholar

[15] S.K. Al-Salehi, F.J. Burke: Quintessence Int. Vol. 28 (1997), p.717.

Google Scholar

[16] J. Perdigão, S. Geraldeli, A.R. Carmo: J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. Vol. 14 (2002), p.31.

Google Scholar

[17] A.A. Zohairy, A.J. de Gee, N. de Jager N, et al: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 83 (2004), p.420.

Google Scholar

[18] R. van Noort, G.E. Cardew, I.C. Howard: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 70 (1991), p.889.

Google Scholar

[19] S. Phrukkanon, M.F. Burrow, M.J. Tyas: Dent. Mater. Vol. 14 (1998), p.212.

Google Scholar

[20] N. Nakabayashi, A. Watanabe, T. Arao: J. Dent. Vol. 26 (1998), p.379.

Google Scholar

[21] H. Sano, B. Ciucchi, W.G. Matthews, et al: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 73 (1994), p.1205.

Google Scholar

[22] M. Staninec G.W. Marshall, J.F. Hilton JF, et al: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 63 (2002), p.342.

Google Scholar

[23] R.F. Schreiner, R.P. Chappell, A.G. Glaros, et al: Dent. Mater. Vol. 14 (1998), p.194.

Google Scholar