Fatigue Crack Growth on FSW AA2024-T3 Aluminum Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

Friction stir welding (FSW) is a solid-state joining process which emerged as an alternative technology to join high strength alloys that were difficult to weld with conventional techniques, [1]. Developments of this technique are being driven by aeronautic, aerospace and railway industries. An advantage of this joining technique is its low heat input when compared with arc welding processes. This feature allows the achievement of high mechanical properties, low distortion and low residual stresses, [2]. Also, since it is a solid-state welding process, hydrogen cracking or heat affected zone (HAZ) softening phenomena are limited. This paper presents a study of fatigue crack growth behaviour of friction stir welded butt joints of AA2024-T3, aluminium commonly used in riveted aeronautic fuselage structures. Crack growth studies are often carried out using uniform thickness joints, ASTM E647 [3]. Nevertheless, for some applications there is a need to join components with different thicknesses, which, under certain limits, can be welded using FSW. Crack growth tests on these joints are not standard. The present study concerns butt joints made using two plates with different thicknesses, 3.8mm and 4.0mm. The joints’ mechanical behaviour was studied performing static (tensile) and fatigue tests. The fatigue crack growth rate of cracks growing in different zones of the welded joint (nugget, heat affected zone - HAZ) and in base material was analysed. The microhardness profile was assessed in order to analyse the influence of the welding process in each weld zone. Further to higher static properties, welded joints present lower crack growth rate when compared with its base material.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

126-138

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Threadgill, P.L., et al., Friction stir welding of aluminium alloys. International Materials Reviews, 2009. 54(2): pp.49-93.

DOI: 10.1179/174328009x411136

Google Scholar

[2] Lienert, T., W.S. Jr., and L. Lehman. Comparison of heat inputs: friction stir welding vs. arc welding. in AWS 2002 Professional Program & Poster Session. (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] E647, A., Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] Thomas, W., et al., Improvements Relating to Friction Welding, TWI, Editor (1992).

Google Scholar

[5] Mishra, R.S. and Z.Y. Ma, Friction stir welding and processing. Materials Science & Engineering R-Reports, 2005. 50(1-2): pp.1-78.

Google Scholar

[6] Christner, B., Enabling technology for an aircraft alternative. Mechanical Engineering Design (on-line ASME journal), , (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] Belitsky, E., Advanced welding boosts space program. Advanced Manufacturing Magazine, (on-line journal), (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] Lee, W., Y. Yeon, and S. Jung, The joint properties of dissimilar formed Al alloys by friction stir welding according to the fixed location of materials. Scripta Materialia, 2003. 49(5): pp.423-428.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(03)00301-4

Google Scholar

[9] Moreira, P.M.G.P., et al., Mechanical and metallurgical characterization of friction stir welding joints of AA6061-T6 with AA6082-T6. Materials & Design, 2009. 30(1): pp.180-187.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.042

Google Scholar

[10] Silva, L.F.M., et al., Multiple-site damage in riveted lap-joints: experimental simulation and finite element prediction. International Journal of Fatigue, 2000. 22(4): pp.319-338.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(99)00129-2

Google Scholar

[11] International, A., Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, E 8 - 04, (2004).

Google Scholar

[12] International, A., Standard Specification for Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Sheet and Plate, B 209M - 04, (2004).

Google Scholar

[13] Mohanty, J.R., B.B. Verma, and P.K. Ray, Determination of fatigue crack growth rate from experimental data: A new approach. International Journal Microstructure and Materials Properties, 2010. 5(1): pp.79-87.

DOI: 10.1504/ijmmp.2010.032503

Google Scholar

[14] Moreira, P.M.G.P., V. Richter-Trummer, and P.M.S.T. d. Castro, Fatigue behaviour of FS, LB and MIG welds of AA6061-T6 and AA6082-T6, in Multiscale fatigue crack initiation and propagation of engineering materials: Structural integrity and microstructural worthiness, G.C. Sih, Editor 2008, Springer. pp.85-132.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8520-8_5

Google Scholar

[15] Davis, J., Aluminum and aluminum alloys. ASM Specialty Handbook1993, Materials Park, OH: ASM International. 784 p.

Google Scholar

[16] Paris, P., P. Gomez, and W. Anderson, A rational analytic theory of fatigue. The Trend in Engineering, 1961. 13(1): pp.9-14.

Google Scholar

[17] Ilman, M.N., Comparative study on fatigue crack growth rate behaviours of friction-stir welded aluminium alloys 2024-T3 and 6061-T6, in Seminar Nasional Tahunan Teknik Mesin (SNTTM) ke-92010: Palembang.

Google Scholar