Initial Methodology for Sustainability Comparison among Materials Processing

Lorenzo Sevilla Hurtado; B. Peinado; Miguel Ángel Sebastián

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.502.79

Paper Titles

Energy Requirements in Manufacturing: Lifecycle and Tribology Considerations
p.55

Graphical Analysis of Improvements in Manufacturing Processes as Result of Kaizen Events
p.63

Holistic Approach to Information Search Based on Six Sigma
p.69

Implementing Manufacturing Features in Mechanical Design
p.73

Initial Methodology for Sustainability Comparison among Materials Processing
p.79

Integration of Quality, Labor Risks Prevention, Environment and Ethical Management. Model Applied to R&D&I and Manufacturing Processes in an Organization
p.85

Machining a Free-Surface via Reverse Engineering
p.91

Maturity Determination of New Forming Processes Considering Uncertain Indicator Values
p.97

Production Planning and Control in an Automobile Closed-Loops Assembly Line
p.103

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 502Initial Methodology for Sustainability Comparison...

Initial Methodology for Sustainability Comparison among Materials Processing

Abstract:

Currently, when the most suitable material manufacturing process is chosen, not only technical or economical aspects have to be considered, otherwise, it has to emphasize its sustainability. In this document, an easy method to compare mass reduction processes and mass conservation processes, with an application to compare drawing process and machining process, is shown. The comparative comparison makes possible to justify that plastic deformation processes usually have more advantages.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Manufacturing Systems (MESIC)

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 502)

Pages:

79-84

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.502.79

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Lorenzo Sevilla Hurtado, B. Peinado, Miguel Ángel Sebastián

Keywords:

Axial Turning, Drawing, Embodied Energy, Forming Process, Machining Process, Sustainability

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] K. Mayumi and H. Tanikawa: Going beyond energy accounting for sustainability (Elsevier 2011).

Google Scholar

[2] A.V.C. Plant, D.J. Harrison, B.J. Griffhiths and B. Lam: Int. J. of Sust. Eng. Vol. 3 (2010), p.3.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Cao, G. Zhou and Y. Qi: Key Eng. Mat. Vol. 467–469 (2011), p.1721.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Darmanata, C. Somohano, S. Saad and T. Perera, in: A sustainability value system principle for a global supply chain, Proc. of 5th International Conference on Responsive Manufacturing – Green Manufacturing (2010).

DOI: 10.1049/cp.2010.0453

Google Scholar

[5] S. Rahimifard, Y. Seow and T. Childs: CIRP Annals – Manuf. Tech. Vol. 59 (2010), p.25.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Kara and S. Ibbotson: CIRP J. of Manuf. Sci. and Tech. (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] D. S. Stenhouse and A. L. Leonoy: Cons. Eng. Vol. 53 (1979), p.120.

Google Scholar

[8] ASM: Metals Handbook. Forming and forging (ASM International, Ohio 2006).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Jakiela, P. Papalambros and A. G. Ulsoy: J. of Mech, Trans, and Autom. in Des. Vol. 107 (1985), p.285.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Boothroy: Fundamentals of Metal Machining and Machine Tools (McGraw–Hill, USA 1975).

Google Scholar