Assessment of Distinct Algorithmic Strategies in the Implementation of Complex Anisotropic Yield Criteria

Tiago Jordão Grilo; Robertt Valente; Ricardo J. Alves de Sousa

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.504-506.685

Paper Titles

Evaluation of Associated and Non-Associated Flow Metal Plasticity; Application for DC06 Deep Drawing Steel
p.661

Unconditionally Convex Yield Functions for Sheet Metal Forming Based on Linear Stress Deviator Transformation
p.667

Compartmentalized Model for the Mechanical Behavior of Titanium
p.673

On the Modeling of Evolving Elastic and Plastic Anisotropy in the Finite Strain Regime – Application to Deep Drawing Processes
p.679

Assessment of Distinct Algorithmic Strategies in the Implementation of Complex Anisotropic Yield Criteria
p.685

Implementation and Validation of a Gurson Damage Model Modified for Shear Loading: Effect of Void Growth Rate and Mesh Size on the Predicted Behavior
p.691

Constitutive Equation for Description of Metallic Materials Behavior during Static and Dynamic Loadings Taking into Account Important Gradients of Plastic Deformation
p.697

Identification of the Plastic Behaviour in the Post-Necking Regime Using a Three Dimensional Reconstruction Technique
p.703

Laser Heat Treatment Effects on Roller Hemming in Aluminum Alloys
p.711

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 504-506Assessment of Distinct Algorithmic Strategies in...

Assessment of Distinct Algorithmic Strategies in the Implementation of Complex Anisotropic Yield Criteria

Abstract:

In this work, distinct algorithmic strategies for the implementation of complex anisotropic criteria in finite element codes are presented. Two different algorithm classes are presented: semi-explicit and semi-implicit procedures, trying to conjugate the best of conventional return-mapping techniques, and accounting for sub-incrementation and subdivision procedures to improve the quality of the obtained results. In the present study, two complex (non-quadratic) anisotropic yield criteria were implemented: Barlat et al. 1991 (Yld91) and Barlat et al. 2004 with 18 coefficients (Yld2004-18p). The performance of the developed algorithms is inferred in cup drawing simulations for aluminum alloys, with the convergence rate as well as the quality of the solutions being assessed, when compared to experimental results. As result, an algorithm and programming framework is provided, suitable for direct implementation in commercial finite element codes, such as Abaqus (Simulia) and Marc (MSC-Software) packages.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 504-506)

Pages:

685-690

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.504-506.685

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Tiago Jordão Grilo, Robertt Valente, Ricardo J. Alves de Sousa

Keywords:

Algorithm (GA), Anisotropic Yield Criteria, Computational Plasticity, Finite Element Method (FEM), Implementation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] R. Hill, A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 193 (1948) 281-297.

Google Scholar

[2] F. Barlat, D. J. Lege and J. C. Brem, A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials, Int. J. Plasticity 7 (1991) 693-712.

DOI: 10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-z

Google Scholar

[3] F. Barlat, H. Aretz, J. W. Yoon, M. E. Karabin, J. C. Brem and R. E. Dick, Linear transformation-based anisotropic yield functions, Int. J. Plasticity 21 (2005) 1009-1039.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004

Google Scholar

[4] A. M. Habraken, Modelling the plastic anisotropy of metals, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 11 (2004) 3-96.

Google Scholar

[5] ABAQUS, Abaqus analysis user's manual (v6. 9), Simulia, Dassault Systémes, (2010).

Google Scholar

[6] E. Hinton, Introduction to nonlinear finite element analysis, NAFEMS Publications, (1992).

Google Scholar

[7] D. R. J. Owen and E. Hinton, Finite Elements in Plasticity: Theory and Practice, Pineridge Press Limited, Swansea, United Kingdom, (1980).

Google Scholar

[8] T. J. Grilo, Study of anisotropic constitutive models for metallic sheets, MSc Dissertation (in Portuguese), University of Aveiro, Portugal, (2011).

Google Scholar

[9] J. W. Yoon, F. Barlat, K. Chung, F. Pourboghrat and D. Y. Yang, Earing predictions based on asymmetric nonquadratic yield function, Int. J. Plasticity 16 (2000) 1075-1104.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(99)00086-8

Google Scholar

[10] J. W. Yoon, F. Barlat, R. E. Dick and M. E. Karabin, Prediction of six or eight ears in a drawn cup based on a new anisotropic yield function, Int. J. Plasticity 22 (2006) 174-193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.013

Google Scholar