Developing Low CO₂ Concretes: Is Clinker Replacement Sufficient? The Need of Cement Use Efficiency Improvement

Abstract:

Cement industry is under stress for mitigating CO₂ emissions: it is responsible for around 5-7% of total global emissions due to the production that went over 2x10⁹ tones in 2006. And this prospect will aggravate since it is expected, for 2050, an increase of 2.5 times, which will make cement industry guilty for more than 30% of CO₂ emissions. Main actions for decreasing emissions are: energy efficiency in kilns, use of alternative fuels and clinker substitution. These, however, are not capable to decrease emissions in a satisfactory way. CO₂ capture is expensive and could increase cement costs. The pressure, which is increasing all over the world, will certainly strike concrete producers. The optimization of cement use in concrete is an undeveloped strategy that can provide a huge contribution. For its development an international and cooperative effort is crucial. This paper proposes to change the focus from the cement production optimization to optimization of concrete production industry, responsible for most of cement consumption. It is discussed the limits of clinker substitution by mineral admixtures, comparing the expected cement demand increase versus the availability of these alternative materials, concluding that, despite the importance of this strategy, it is actually not capable for mitigating cement CO₂ emissions in a satisfactory way. It is discussed and assessed technical possibilities and limits of optimization of cement content in concrete, based on literature data analysis using two new environmental indicators Binder Intensity and CO₂ Intensity. There is a potential to reduce significantly the cement content on concrete, being possible to increase concrete production without increasing cement production and CO₂ generation. This can impact significantly on concrete environmental load to global warming and also in its cost, making possible to increase popular habitations construction mainly in some developing countries which have a lack of different sort of infrastructure where concrete technology is still dominant.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 517)
• Pages: 342-351
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.517.342
• Online since: June 2012
• Authors: Bruno Luís Damineli, Vanderley Moacyr John
• Keywords: Cement, CO₂, Concrete, Cost, Environmental Load, Global Warming, Popular Habitation

References

[1] World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), The Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI), 2007, 8p. (CSI Report). Available: <http: /wbcsd. org>.

[2] K. Humphreys, M. Mahasenan, Substudy 8: Climate Change, In: Battelle. Toward a Sustainable Cement Industry, 2002, 34p (WBCSD Report). Available: <http: /wbcsd. org>.

[3] Office For Climate Change (OCC), Stern Review: the Economics of Climate Change, 2005, 27p. (Executive Summary). Available: <http: /www. occ. gov. uk/activities/stern. htm>.

[4] L. Bernstein et al, Chapter 7: Industry, in: Metz et al (ed). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation – Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, 2007, pp.447-496.

DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2014.954464

[5] World Business Council For Sustainable DevelopmenT (WBCSD), Cement Technology Roadmap 2009 – Carbon Emissions Reductions up to 2050, 2009, 36p. (CSI Report). Available: <http: /wbcsd. org>.

[6] N. Müller, J. Harnish, A blueprint for a climate friendly cement industry. Gland: WWF Lafarge Conservation Partnership, 2008, 94p. (WWF-Lafarge Conservation Partnership Report).

[7] B. L. Damineli et al, Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use, Cement and Concrete Composites 32 (2010) 555-562.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.009

[8] World Business Council For Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Cement Industry Energy and CO2 Performance - Getting the Numbers Right, 2009. 44p. (CSI Report). Available: <http: /wbcsd. org>.

[9] Pira International – Intertechpira, Future of ferrous slag: market forecasts to 2020, 2009, 144p. (Market Report). Available: <http: /www. intertechpira. com/Future-of-Ferrous-Slag-Market-Forecasts-to-2020. aspx>.

[10] USGS. Iron and steel slag statistics, 2010, 3p. Available: <http: /minerals. usgs. gov/ds/2005/140/>.

[11] Instituto Brasileiro de Siderurgia (IBS), Siderurgia Brasileira: Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2008, 2008, 64p. (in portuguese) (Fourth Assessment Report). Available: <http: /www. ibs. org>.

[12] E. Gartner, Industrially interesting approaches to low CO2, cements, Cement and Concrete Research 34 (2004) 1489-1498.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021

[13] J. K. Yamamoto et al, Environmental Impact Reduction on the Production of Blended Portland Cement in Brazil, Environmental Geosciences 4 (1997) 192-206.

[14] United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Study on Increasing the Usage of Recovered Mineral Components in Federally Funded Projects Involving Procurement of Cement or Concrete to Address the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, 2008, 225p. Available: <http: /www. epa. gov/osw/conserve/tools/cpg/pdf/rtc/report4-08. pdf>.

DOI: 10.4135/9781483346526.n422

[15] American Concrete Institute (ACI), 234R-06: Guide for the Use of Silica Fume in Concrete, 2006, 63p. Available: <http: /www. concrete. org/bookstorenet/ProductDetail. aspx?ItemID=23406>.

DOI: 10.14359/978

[16] Malhotra, V. M., Availability and management of fly ash in India, The Indian Concrete Journal (2005), 5p. Available: <http: /www. icjonline. com/forum/Point_of_view. pdf>.

[17] USGS, Coal and combustion production statistics, 2010, 3p. Available: <http: /minerals. usgs. gov/ds/2005/140/>.

[18] B. R. Stewart, R. S. Kalyoncu, Materials Flow in the Production and Use of Coal Combustion Products, in: 1999 International Ash Utilization Symposium, Center For Applied Energy Research University of Kentucky, paper 46, 1999, Proceedings… Kentucky, 1999, 9p. Available: <http: /www. flyash. info/1999/econom/kalyon2. pdf>.

DOI: 10.4177/ccgp-d-15-00008.1

[19] M. Höok et al, A supply-driven forecast for the future global coal production, Contribution to ASPO, 2008, 48p. Available: <http: /www. tsl. uu. se/uhdsg/Publications/Coalarticle. pdf>.

[20] CEMBUREAU, Environmental benefits of using alternative fuels in cement production – a life-cycle approach, 1999, 25p. Available : <http: /www. cembureau. be>.

[21] J. S. Damtoft, et al, Sustainable development and climate change initiatives, Cement and Concrete Research 38 (2008) 115-127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.008

[22] A. Josa, et al, Comparative analysis of available life cycle inventories of cement in the EU, Cement and Concrete Research 34 (2004) 1313-1320.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.020

[23] International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy Technology Perspectives – Scenarios & Strategies to 2050, 2006, 486p. Available : <http: /www. iea. org/Textbase/techno/etp/index. asp>.

[24] United States Geological Survey (USGS), USGS Minerals Yearbook: Cement Annual Report 2005, 2007, Available: <http: /minerals. usgs. gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/cement/cemenmyb05. pdf>.

DOI: 10.4135/9781412939591.n1177

[25] Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT), NBR 12655: Concreto de cimento Portland – Preparo, controle e recebimento – Procedimento, Rio de Janeiro, 2006, 18p (in portuguese).

[26] H. Grube, B. Kerkhoff, The new German concrete standerds DIN EN 206-1 and DIN EN 1045-2 as basis for the design of durable constructions, Concrete Technology Reports (2004) 19-27.

[27] R. Wassermann, A. Katz, A. Bentur, Minimum cement content requirements: a must or a myth?, Materials and Structures 42 (2009) 973-982.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-008-9436-0

[28] P. K. Mehta, Society, Sustainability and the global concrete industry, Curitiba, 08 out. 2009, Speech on 51º Brazilian Congress of Concrete (IBRACON), Curitiba, (2009).