Sub-Nanometer Line Width and Line Profile Measurement Using STEM Images with Metal Coating

Article Preview

Abstract:

The novel method of sub-nanometer uncertainty for the line width and line profile measurement using STEM (Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope) images is proposed to calibrate CD-SEM line width measurement. In accordance with the proposed method, the traceability and reference metrology of line width measurements are established using Si lattice structures. The interface of SiO2-Air is defined using image intensity of STEM image after metal coating. The edge positions of the Si line from top to bottom are detected. Then, the pixel size of the images is evaluated using 2D Fourier analysis for Si lattice structures. Using the proposed method, the line profile and line width of 50 nm are measured with expanded uncertainty less than 0.3 nm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 523-524)

Pages:

957-960

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Nakayama, S. Gonda, I. Misumi, T. Kurosawa, J. Kitta, H. Mine, K. Sasada, S. Yoneda, T. Mizuno, Novel CD-SEM calibration reference patterned by EB cell projection lithography, Proc. SPIE 5752 (2005) 591-602.

DOI: 10.1117/12.597165

Google Scholar

[2] A. Yamaguchi, H. Fukuda, H. Kawada, T. Iizumi, Impact of long-edge roughness (LER) on accuracy in critical dimension measurement and new guideline for CD metrology, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 44 (2005) 5575-5580.

DOI: 10.1143/jjap.44.5575

Google Scholar

[3] J.S. Villarrubia, A.E. Vladar, M.T. Postek, A simulation study of repeatability and bias in the CD-SEM, Proc. SPIE 5038 (2003) 138-149.

DOI: 10.1117/12.485012

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Nakayama, H. Kawada, S. Yoneda, T. Mizuno, Novel CD-SEM calibration reference consisting of 100-nm pitch grating and positional identification mark, Proc. SPIE 6518 (2007), 65183J.

DOI: 10.1117/12.710772

Google Scholar

[5] H. Abe, A. Hamaguchi, Y. Yamazaki, Evaluation of CD-SEM measurement uncertainty using secondary electron simulation with charging effect, Proc. SPIE 6518 (2007) 65180L.

DOI: 10.1117/12.712191

Google Scholar

[6] R. Dixson, N.G. Orji, Comparison and uncertainties of standards for critical dimension atomic force microscope tip width calibration, Proc. SPIE 6518 (2007) 651816.

DOI: 10.1117/12.714032

Google Scholar

[7] FIB (FB-2100), http: /www. hitachi-hitec. com/global/em/fib/fib_index. html.

Google Scholar

[8] STEM (HD-2700), http: /www. hitachi-hitec. com/global/em/tem/tem_index. html.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Takamasu, K. Kuwabara, S. Takahashi, T. Mizuno, H. Kawada, Sub-nanometer Calibration of CD-SEM Line Width by Using STEM, Proc. SPIE 7638 (2010) 55.

DOI: 10.1117/12.846436

Google Scholar

[10] K. Takamasu, H. Okito, S. Takahashi, M. Konno, O. Inoue, H. Kawada, Sub-nanometer line width and line profile measurement, Proc. SPIE 797108 (2011) 1-8.

DOI: 10.1117/12.879036

Google Scholar