Analysis on Perforation of Ductile Metallic Plates by APM2 Bullets

Article Preview

Abstract:

By employing the theoretical model of a rigid sharp-nosed projectile perforating the ductile metallic target plate, the present paper re-analyzes the previously published experimental data of APM2 bullet and its hard steel core perforating aluminum armor plates and high-strength steel plates, respectively. Although the bullet deforms during the perforation, the test confirms that the hard steel core dominates in the perforation but the brass jacket, lead cap and end cap only have limited influence on the ballistics. Therein the perforation model of a rigid sharp-nosed projectile may be conducted to analyze the perforation of APM2 bullet. With increasing the thickness of ductile metallic target plate, the inertia effect of target will arise and obviously affect the terminal ballistics. The inertia effect of target must be considered in the scenario of thick target plate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 535-536)

Pages:

68-71

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Awerbuch, S.R. Bodner, Analysis of the mechanics of perforation of projectiles in metallic plates, Int J Solids Structures. 10(1974) 671-684.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(74)90050-x

Google Scholar

[2] M.R. Edwards, A.Mathewson, The ballistic properties of tool steel as a potential improved armour plate, Int J impact Engng. 19(1997) 297-309.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(97)83210-1

Google Scholar

[3] T. Borvik, S. Dey, A.H. Clausen, Perforation resistance of five different high-strength steel plates subjected to small-arms projectiles, Int J Impact Engng. 36(2009) 948-964.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.12.003

Google Scholar

[4] T. Borvik, M.J. Forrestal, T.L. Warren, Perforation of 5083-H116 Aluminum Armor Plates with Ogive-Nose Rods and 7.62 mm APM2 Bullets, Experi Mech. 50(2010) 969-978.

DOI: 10.1007/s11340-009-9262-5

Google Scholar

[5] M.J. Forrestal, T. Borvik, T.L. Warren, Perforation of 7075-T651 Aluminum Armor Plates with 7.62 mm APM2 Bullets, Experi Mech. 50(2010) 1245-1251.

DOI: 10.1007/s11340-009-9328-4

Google Scholar

[6] X.W. Chen, Q.M. Li, Perforation of a thick plate by rigid projectiles, Int J Impact Engng. 28(2003) 743-759.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(02)00152-5

Google Scholar

[7] M.J. Forrestal, T.L. Warren, Perforation equations for conical and ogival nose rigid projectiles into aluminum target plates, Int J Impact Engng. 36(2009) 220-225.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.04.005

Google Scholar

[8] X.W. Chen, X.L. Huang, G.J. Liang, Comparative Analysis of Perforation Models of Metallic Plates by Rigid Sharp-Nosed Projectiles, Int J Impact Engng. 38(2011) 613-621.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.12.005

Google Scholar