Seismic Performance Analysis of a Multi-Span Continuous Girder Bridge under Multi-Excitation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Although the seismic response analysis under the multi-excitation was widely focused on the long-span flexible bridges, it is still necessary to pay more attention to this point of continuous girder bridges since the dynamic behavior of this type of bridges are different with either long-span bridges or simple support bridges. Based on the nonlinear dynamic time history analysis, a four-span continuous beam FEM was built, and the effect of excitation types and structure size on seismic response was studied. And results indicate that the structural performance of continuous girder bridges is sensitive with the space correlation of different location of seismic excitation. So its necessary to consider the space effect of excitation while carrying out a seismic design of continuous beam.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

141-152

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kiureghian A D, Neuenhofer A. Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. EESD, 1992, 21: 713~740.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290210805

Google Scholar

[2] Kiureghian A D, Neuenhofer A. A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. EESD, 1996, 25: 99~111.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199601)25:1<99::aid-eqe540>3.0.co;2-c

Google Scholar

[3] Li Hong-nan, Theoretical Analysis and Design of Structures to Multiple Earthquake Excitations.  Chinese science publishing company, (1998).

Google Scholar

[4] Qiu Fa-wei, Qian Jia-ru. A pseudo-dynamic test method for multidimsional and multiple excitation. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1999, 32(5): 28~34.

Google Scholar

[5] Li Rui, Ye Liao-yuan, Yang Zhong-heng etc, Form selection and design of high piers in high seismic intensity region. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2008, 33(1): 52~55.

Google Scholar

[6] Fan Li-chu, Anti-seismic ductility in bridge design[M]. Beijing: People's Communications Publishing House, (1998).

Google Scholar

[7] Quan Wei, Li Hong-nan, Effects of spatial variable ground motions on the seismic response of isolated bridge with LRB. World Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 23(4): 187~193.

Google Scholar

[8] Quan Wei, Studies on seismic analysis of large-span bridges subjected to multi-component and multi-support earthquake excitaitons, Dalian University of Technology, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] Lupoi A., Franchin P., Pinto P.E., et al. Seismic design of bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34: 327~348.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.444

Google Scholar

[10] Sextos A. g., Pitilakis K.D., Kappos A.J. Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: parametric study. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2003, 32: 629~652.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.242

Google Scholar

[11] Ohsaki M. Sensitivity of optimum designs for spatially varying ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2001, 127: 1324~1329.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2001)127:11(1324)

Google Scholar