A Plasticity Induced Anisotropic Damage Model for Sheet Forming Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The global fuel crisis and increasing public safety concerns are driving the automotive industry to design high strength and low weight vehicles. The development of Dual Phase (DP) steels has been a big step forward in achieving this goal. DP steels are used in many automotive body-in-white structural components such as A and B pillar reinforcements, longitudinal members and crash structure parts. DP steels are also used in other industrial sectors such as precision tubes, train seats and Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) cylinders. Although the ductility of DP steel is higher than classical high strength steels, it is lower than that of classical deep drawing steels it has to replace. The low ductility of DP steels is attributed to damage development. Damage not only weakens the material but also reduces the ductility by formation of meso-cracks due to interacting micro defects. Damage in a material usually refers to presence of micro defects in the material. It is a known fact that plastic deformation induces damage in DP steels. Therefore damage development in these steels have to be included in the simulation of the forming process. In ductile metals, damage leads to crack initiation. A crack is anisotropic which makes damage anisotropic in nature. However, most researchers assume damage to be an isotropic phenomenon. For correct and accurate simulation results, damage shall be considered as anisotropic, especially if the results are used to determine the crack propagation direction. This paper presents an efficient plasticity induced anisotropic damage model to simulate complex failure mechanisms and accurately predict failure in macro-scale sheet forming processes. Anisotropy in damage can be categorized based on the cause which induces the anisotropy, i.e. the loading state and the material microstructure. According to the Load Induced Anisotropic Damage (LIAD) model, if the material is deformed in one direction then damage will be higher in this direction compared to the other two orthogonal directions, irrespective of the microstructure of the material. According to Material Induced Anisotropic Damage (MIAD) model, if there is an anisotropy in shape or distribution of the particles responsible for damage (hard second phase particles, inclusions or impurities) then the material will have different damage characteristics for different orientations in the sheet material. The LIAD part of the damage model is a modification of Lemaitre’s (ML) anisotropic damage model. Modifications are made for damage development under compression state and influence of strain rate on damage, and are presented in this paper. Viscoplastic regularization is used to avoid pathological mesh dependency. The MIAD part of the model is an extension of the LIAD model. Experimental evidence is given of the MIAD phenomenon in DP600 steel. The experimental analysis is carried out using tensile tests, optical strain measurement system (ARAMIS) and scanning electron microscopy. The extension to incorporate MIAD in the ML anisotropic damage model is presented in this paper as well. The paper concludes with a validation of the anisotropic damage model for different applications. The MIAD part of the model is validated by experimental cylindrical cup drawing wheras the LIAD part of the model is validated by the cross die drawing process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

1245-1251

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Lemaitre and R. Desmorat. Engineering Damage Mechanics. Springer, 2005.

Google Scholar

[2] Niazi, M.S., Wisselink, H.H., Meinders, T., & Huetink, J. (2012). Failure predictions for DP steel cross-die test using anisotropic damage. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 21(5), 713-754.

DOI: 10.1177/1056789511407646

Google Scholar

[3] Niazi, M.S., Wisselink, H.H., Meinders, T., & Boogaard van den, A.H. (2012). Material induced anisotropic damage in DP600. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, accepted for publication.

DOI: 10.1177/1056789512468914

Google Scholar

[4] H. Huh, S. B. Kim, J. H. Song, and J. H. Lim. Dynamic tensile characteristics of TRIP-type and DP-type steel sheets for an auto-body. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 50:918–931, 2008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.09.004

Google Scholar

[5] Niazi, M.S., Wisselink, H.H., & Meinders, T. (2012). Viscoplastic regularization of local damage models: revisited. Computational mechanics

DOI: 10.1007/s00466-012-0717-7

Google Scholar

[6] P. van Liempt. Work hardening and substructural geometry of metals. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 45:459–464, 1994.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(94)90382-4

Google Scholar

[7] A. Krabiell and W. Dahl. Zum einfluss von temperatur und dehngeschwindigkeit auf die streckgrenze von baustählen unterschiedlicher festigkeit. Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen, 52:429–436, 1981.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.198104601

Google Scholar