Paper Titles

On the Study of Distinct Algorithmic Strategies in the Implementation of Advanced Anisotropic Models with Mixed Hardening
p.1174

Asymmetric Yield Locus Evolution for HCP Materials: A Continuum Constitutive Modeling Approach
p.1184

Crystal Plasticity Modeling of the Through-Thickness Texture Heterogeneity in Heavily Rolled Aluminum
p.1189

How to Combine the Parameters of the Yield Criteria and the Hardening Law
p.1195

Comparison of Different Constitutive Models in Sheet Metal Forming
p.1203

Activation Energy for Hot Deformation of 15-5 PH Stainless Steel
p.1217

Hot Deformation Studies of a Low Carbon Steel Containing V
p.1224

Modelling of Polishing Tools for High Spatial Frequency Defect Correction on Aspherical Surfaces
p.1232

A Plasticity Induced Anisotropic Damage Model for Sheet Forming Processes
p.1245

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 554-557Comparison of Different Constitutive Models in...

Comparison of Different Constitutive Models in Sheet Metal Forming

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of different constitutive models in sheet metal forming are investigated by considering the cylindrical and square cup drawing and V-bending processes. Numerical analyses are performed by employing eight different constitutive models. These are elastic plastic constitutive model with isotropic hardening, elastic plastic constitutive model with kinematic hardening, elastic plastic constitutive model with combined hardening, power law isotropic plasticity, piecewise linear isotropic plasticity, three-parameter Barlat, anisotropic plasticity and transversely anisotropic elastic plastic models. The simulations are performed for three different materials, St12 steel, Al-5182 aluminum and stainless steel 409 Ni, by using a commercial finite element code. A number of experiments are carried out and the experimental and analytical results are utilized to evaluate the results of simulations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

The Current State-of-the-Art on Material Forming

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

1203-1216

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.1203

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2013

Authors:

Meriç Uçan, Haluk Darendeliler

Keywords:

Anisotropy, Constitutive Model, Finite Element Method (FEM), Hardening Law, Sheet Metal Forming, Yield Function

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z. Marciniak, Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.

[2] R. Hill, A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 193 (1948) 281–297.

[3] P. B. Mellor, Sheet metal forming, Int. Metals. Rev. 26 (1981) 1–20.

[4] P. B. Mellor, A. Parmer, Plasticity of sheet metal forming, In: D. P. Koistinen, Wang, N. M. (Eds.), Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, Plenum Press, New York, p.53–74 1978.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2880-3_3

[5] R. Hill, Theoretical plasticity of textured aggregates, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 85 (1979) 179–191.

DOI: 10.1017/s0305004100055596

[6] R. Hill, Constitutive modeling of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 38 (1990) 405–417.

[7] R. Hill, A user-friendly theory of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 35 (1993) 19–25.

[8] F. Barlat, J. Lian, Plastic behavior and stretch ability of sheet metals, Part I: a yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions, Int. J. Plast. 5 (1989) 51–56.

DOI: 10.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3

[9] F. Barlat, D. J. Lege, J. C. Brem, A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials, Int. J. Plast. 7 (1991) 693–712.

DOI: 10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-z

[10] F. Barlat, R. C. Becker, Y. Hayashida, Y.Maeda, M. Yanagawa, K. Chung, J. C. Brem, D. J. Lege, K. Matsui, S. J. Murtha, S. Hattori, Yielding description for solution strengthened aluminum alloys, Int. J. Plast. 13 (1997) 385–401.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(97)80005-8

[11] F. Barlat, J. C. Brem, J. W. Yoon, K. Chung, R. E. Dick, S. H. Choi, F. Pourboghrat, E. Chu, D. J. Lege, Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets, Int. J. Plast. 19 (2003) 1297–1319.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(02)00019-0

[12] F. Barlat, H. Aretz, J. W. Yoon, M. E. Karabin, J. C. Brem, R. E. Dick, Linear transformation based anisotropic yield functions, Int. J. Plast. 21 (2005) 1009–1039.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004

[13] A. P. Karaﬁllis, M. C. Boyce, A general anisotropic yield criterion using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41 (1993) 1859–1886.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(93)90073-o

[14] D. Banabic, H. Aretz, D. S. Comsa, L. Paraianu, An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets, Int. J. Plast. 21 (2005) 493–512.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.003

[15] H. C. Wu, Anisotropic plasticity for sheet metals using the concept of combined isotropic–kinematic hardening, Int. J. Plast. 18 (2002) 1661–1682.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(01)00060-2

[16] L. Geng, Y. Shen, R. H. Wagoner, Anisotropic hardening equations derived from reverse-bend testing, Int. J. Plast. 18 (2002) 743–767.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(01)00048-1

[17] P. J. Armstrong, C. O. Frederick, A Mathematical representation of the multi-axial Bauschinger effect, Central Electricity Generating Board Report, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, RD/B/N731 1966.

[18] L. Geng, R. H. Wagoner, Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 44 (2002) 123–148.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(01)00085-6

[19] K. Chung, M. G. Lee, D. Kim, C. Kim, M. L. Wenner, F. Barlat, Springback evaluation of automotive sheets based on isotropic–kinematic hardening laws and non-quadratic anisotropic yield functions, Part I: theory and formulation, Int. J. Plast. 21 (2005) 861–882.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(04)00088-9

[20] M. G. Lee, D. Kim, C. Kim, M. L. Wenner, R. H. Wagoner, K. Chung, Springback evaluation of automotive sheets based on isotropic–kinematic hardening laws and non-quadratic anisotropic yield functions Part II: characterization of material properties, Int. J. Plast. 21 (2005a) 883–914.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(04)00089-0

[21] M. G. Lee, D. Kim, C. Kim, M. L. Wenner, K. Chung, Springback evaluation of automotive sheets based on isotropic–kinematic hardening laws and non-quadratic anisotropic yield functions Part III: applications, Int. J. Plast. 21 (2005b) 915–953.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.014

[22] R. P. R. Cardoso, J. W. Yoon, Stress integration method for a nonlinear kinematic/isotropic hardening model and its characterization based on polycrystalline plasticity, Int. J. Plast. 25 (2009) 1684–1710.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.09.007

[23] Y. F. Dafalias and E. P. Popov, Plastic internal variables formalism of cyclic plasticity, J. Appl. Mech. 98 (1976) 645-651.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3423948

[24] M. Zampaloni, N. Abedrabbo, F. Pourboghrat, Experimental and numerical study of stamp hydro forming of sheet metals, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 45 (2003) 1815–1848.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.11.006

[25] J. B. Kim, J. W. Yoon, D. Y. Yang, Investigation into the wrinkling behavior of thin sheets in the cylindrical cup deep drawing process using bifurcation theory, Int. Num. Meth. Eng. 56 (2003)1673–1705.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.629

[26] J. W. Yoon, F. Barlat, R. E. Dick, M. E. Karabin, Prediction of six or eight ears in a drawn cup based on a new anisotropic yield function, Int. J. Plast. 22 (2006) 174–193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.013

[27] M. C. Oliveira, J. L. Alves, B. M. Chaparro, L. F. Menezes, Study on the inﬂuence of work-hardening modeling in springback prediction, Int. J. Plast. 23 (2007) 516–543.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.07.003

[28] N. Ivaylo Vladimirov, Michael P. Pietryga, Stefanie Reese, Anisotropic finite elastoplasticity with nonlinear kinematic and isotropic hardening and application to sheet metal forming, Int. J. Plast. 26 (2010) 659–687.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.09.008

[29] Junehyung Kim, Wonoh Lee, Daeyong Kim, Jinhak Kong, Chongmin Kim, Michael. L. Wenner, and Kwansoo Chung, Effect of hardening laws and yield function types on springback simulations of dual-phase steel automotive sheets, Metals and Materials International 12 (2006) 293–305.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03027546

[30] P. A. Eggertsen, K. Mattiasson, On the modeling of the bending–unbending behavior for accurate springback predictions, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 51 (2009) 547–563.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.05.007

[31] Bingtao Tang, Xiaoyang Lu, Zhaoqing Wang, Zhen Zhao, Springback investigation of anisotropic aluminum alloy sheet with a mixed hardening rule and Barlat yield criteria in sheet metal forming, Mater. and Des. 31 (2010) 2043–2050.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.017

[32] Aboozar Taherizadeh, Daniel E. Green, Abbas Ghaei, Jeong-Whan Yoon, A non-associated constitutive model with mixed isotropic-kinematic hardening for finite element simulation of sheet metal forming, Int. J. Plast. 26 (2010) 288–309.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.07.003

[33] M. Ucan, Effect of Constitutive Modeling in Sheet Metal Forming, M.Sc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey 2011.

[34] William F. Hosford, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Cambridge, 2005.

[35] S. Neto, D. Peric, Drj Owen, Computational Methods for Plasticity, Theory and Applications, Willey, 2008.