Structural Seismic Damage Detection Using Fractal Dimension of Time-Frequency Feature

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, a data-driven approach to localizing structural damage subjected to ground motion is proposed by using the fractal dimension of the time-frequency features of structural dynamic responses. The time-frequency feature is defined as the real part of wavelet coefficient and the fractal dimension adopts the box-counting method. It is shown that the proposed fractal dimensions at each story of linear system are identical, while the fractal dimension at the stories with nonlinearity is different from those at the stories with linearity. Therefore, the nonlinear behavior of structural damage caused by strong ground motions can be detected and localized through comparing the fractal dimensions of structural responses at different stories. Shaking table test on a uniform 16-story 3-bay steel frame with added friction dampers modelling interstory nonlinear behavior was conducted. The experiment results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method to localize single and multi seismic damage of structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

554-560

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Farrar, K. Worden, M. Todd, G. Park, J. Nichols, D. Adams, M. Bement K Farinholt. (2007). Nonlinear system identification for damage detection. Report LA-14353, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM

DOI: 10.2172/922532

Google Scholar

[2] C. Loh, T. Wu, N. Huang. Application of the empirical mode decomposition-Hilbert spectrum method to identify near-fault ground-motion characteristics and structural responses. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 91 (2001), 1339-1357.

DOI: 10.1785/0120000715

Google Scholar

[3] J. Yang, Y. Lei, S. Lin, N. Huang. Hilbert-Huang based approach for structural damage detection. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 130(2004) 85-95.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2004)130:1(85)

Google Scholar

[4] R. Zhang, S. Ma, E. Safak, S. Hartzell. Hilbert-Huang transform analysis of dynamic and earthquake motion recordings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 129(2003), 861-875.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2003)129:8(861)

Google Scholar

[5] D. Spina, C. Valente, G. Tomlinson. A new procedure for detecting nonlinearity from transient data using the Gabor transform. Nonlinear Dynamics 11 (1996), 235-254.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00120719

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Hou, M. Noori, R. Amand. Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 126(2000), 677-683.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2000)126:7(677)

Google Scholar

[7] T. Pan, C. Lee. Application of wavelet theory to identify yielding in seismic response of bi-linear structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31(2002), 379-398.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.113

Google Scholar

[8] P. Spanos, A. Giaralis, N. Politis. Time-frequency representation of earthquake accelerograms and inelastic structural response records using the adaptive chirplet decomposition and empirical mode decomposition. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 (2007), 675-689.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.11.007

Google Scholar

[9] M. Todorovska, M. Trifunac. Earthquake damage detection in the Imperial County Services Building I: The data and time-frequency analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 27(2007), 564-576.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.10.005

Google Scholar

[10] S. Mallat. A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, London, 2007.

Google Scholar

[11] B. Mandelbrot. The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1982.

Google Scholar

[12] K. Kevin, Y. Wang. Energy-based design of structures using modified force analogy method. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 12 (2003), 393-407.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.234

Google Scholar