Dynamic Testing and Long Term Monitoring of a Twelve Span Viaduct

Article Preview

Abstract:

Because of the critical importance of bridges in land transport networks and broader economy, an increasing interest in permanent observation of their dynamic behavior under traffic, seismic and other live loads has been observed during the past decade. In addition, recent technological advances have made the installation and operation of permanent dynamic monitoring systems much more practical and economical. A multi-channel dynamic monitoring system is being installed in the 12 span pre-cast, post-tensioned Newmarket Viaduct, recently built using the balanced cantilever method and situated in Auckland, New Zealand. This paper first describes the preliminary studies including extensive one-off ambient vibration tests using wireless sensors that provided important information for the design of the monitoring system shortly after construction of the bridge. Then the designed monitoring system is characterized and proposed research that will be undertaken using the monitoring data is outlined.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 569-570)

Pages:

342-349

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Clemente, P., Marulo, F., Lecce, L., & Bifulco, A. Experimental modal analysis of the Garigliano cable-stayed bridge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 1998. 17(7-8), 485–493.

DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(98)00022-0

Google Scholar

[2] Pietrzko, S., Cantieni, R., & Deger, Y. Modal testing of a steel/concrete composite bridge with a servo-hydraulic shaker. In Proc. 14th International Modal Analysis Conference. 1996. Dearbon, Michigan, 91-98.

Google Scholar

[3] Cantieni, R., & Pietrzko, S. Modal testing of a wooden footbridge using random excitation. In Proc. of the 11th International Modal Analysis Conference. 1991. Kissimmee, USA, 1230-1237.

Google Scholar

[4] Farrar, C., Duffey, T., Cornwell P., & Doebling, S. Excitation methods for bridge structures. In Proc. of the 17th International Modal Analysis Conference. 1999. Kissimmee, Florida, 1063-1068.

Google Scholar

[5] Cunha, A., Caetano, E., & Magalhães, F. Output-only dynamic testing of bridges and special structures. Structural Concrete. 2007. 8(2), 67–85.

DOI: 10.1680/stco.2007.8.2.67

Google Scholar

[6] Gentile, C. Modal and structural identification of a RC arch bridge, Structural Engineering and Mechanics. 2006. 22(1), 53-70.

DOI: 10.12989/sem.2006.22.1.053

Google Scholar

[7] Altunisik, A., Bayraktar, A., & Sevim, B. Output-only system identification of post tensioned segmental concrete highway bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2011. 16(2), 259-266.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000150

Google Scholar

[8] Liu, T., Chiang, W., Chen, C., Hsu, W., Lu, L., & Chu, T. Identification and monitoring of bridge health from ambient vibration data. Journal of Vibration and Control. 2011. 17(4), 589-603.

DOI: 10.1177/1077546309360049

Google Scholar

[9] Magalhães, F., Caetano, E., Cunha, A., Flamand, O., & Grillaud, G. Ambient and free vibration tests of the Millau Viaduct: Evaluation of alternative processing strategies. Engineering Structures. 2012. 45, 372-384.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.038

Google Scholar

[10] Wong K. Y. Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 2004. 11, 91–124.

DOI: 10.1002/stc.33

Google Scholar

[11] Ko, J. M., & Ni, Y. Q. Technology development in structural health monitoring of large scale bridges. Engineering Structures. 2005. 27, 1715-1725.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021

Google Scholar

[12] Magalhães, F., Cunha, A., & Caetano, E. Dynamic monitoring of a long span arch bridge. Engineering Structures. 2008. 30(11), 3034-3044.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.020

Google Scholar

[13] Auckland Motorways. Newmarket Viaduct replacement. http: /www. aucklandmotorways. co. nz/ southern/newmarketviaduct. php, accessed 20/01/(2013).

Google Scholar

[14] Chen, X., Omenzetter, P., & Beskhyroun, S. Comparison of output-only methods for modal identification of a twelve-span viaduct. In Proc. 5th International Operational Modal Analysis Conference. 2013. Guimarães, Portugal. (in press).

Google Scholar

[15] Bendat, J., & Piersol, A. Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures. USA: John Wiley and Sons. (2004).

Google Scholar

[16] Jacobsen, N., Andersen, P., & Brincker, R. Using EFDD as a robust technique to deterministic excitation in operational modal analysis. In Proc. of the 2nd International Operational Modal Analysis Conference (IOMAC). 2007. Copenhagen, Denmark, 193-200.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118535141.ch7

Google Scholar

[17] Chen, X., & Omenzetter, P. A framework for reliability assessment of an in-service bridge using structural health monitoring data. Key Engineering Materials. 2013. 558, 39-51.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.558.39

Google Scholar