The Role of Microstructure on the Fracture Behaviour and Statistics of Advanced Ceramics

Article Preview

Abstract:

Strength data of three advanced ceramics were fitted to the Weibull, normal and lognormal distributions. The three ceramics had similar grain size and varied in binder content. The role of microstructure in the failure mechanism of such ceramics was analysed in terms of the chosen strength distributions. The best-fit distributions were determined using the maximum log-likelihood criteria and a comparison between the best and worst fit was conducted using the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). Both large and small samples were tested to investigate possible scaling effects for these ceramics. It was found that for two of the three ceramics tested that a lognormal distribution rather then the conventionally used Weibull distribution was preferable in characterising the strength data. A small drop in strength was noticed between large and small samples but this trend was not thought to be a result of scaling rather due to the decrease in binder content.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 577-578)

Pages:

57-60

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. Weibull, Journal of applied mechanics 18.3 (1951), pp.293-297.

Google Scholar

[2] L. Chunsheng, R.Danzer, and F.D. Fischer, Physical Review 65.6 (2002), 067102.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Bikramjit, et al., Ceramics International 35.1 (2009), pp.237-246.

Google Scholar

[4] D.R. Cox, D. Oakes. Analysis of survival data. Vol. 21. Chapman & Hall/CRC 1(984).

Google Scholar

[5] H. Akaike, in Applications of Statistics, edited by P.R. Krishnaiah (1977).

Google Scholar

[6] R. Danzer, et al. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 74.18 (2007), pp.2919-2932.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Chunsheng, R. Danzer, and F.D. Fischer, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 24.14 (2004): pp.3643-3651.

Google Scholar