Goodness Indicator and Technological Optimization of Honing

Abstract:

Optimisation of technological processes is an important field of research of machining processes. Honing process, its aim and results are affected more factors. Effectiveness is expressed by the following parameters: accuracy, surface roughness, complex surface quality (integrity),material removal rate, costs and productivity of the process. Developed method helps the technology planning and with the introduced new goodness indicator, investigates and corrects it. Optimization and minimization of costs can be ensured at given technological circumstances and technological parameters. With adjustment of the pressure (p) and the cutting speed (v_c) economy of the process can be increased in the factory. Developed method can be applied for machining by other abrasive cutting tools. The paper summarizes new results of this theoretical and experimental research.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 581)
• Pages: 261-265
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.581.261
• Online since: October 2013
• Authors: Ottó Szabó
• Keywords: Economical, Grinding, Honing, Lapping, Material Removal Rate (MRR), Productivity

References

[1] König W., Klocke F., Fertigungsverfahren. Band 2. VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, (1996).

[2] Sabri L., Mezghani S., El Mansori M., Zahouani H., Multiscale Study of Finish-Honing Process in Mass Production of Cylinder Liner. Wear 271, 2011. pp.509-513.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.03.026

[3] Takács J., Up-to-date Technology in Formation of Surface Quality. Korszerű technológiák a felületi tulajdonságok alakításában (In Hungarian) Műegyetemi Kiadó, Budapest, 2004. p.346 ISBN 963 420 789 8.

[4] Puente Leon F., Evaluation of Honed Cylinder Bores. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology V. 51. 1. 2002. pp.503-506.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61571-6

[5] Buj-Corral I., Vivancos-Calvet J., Roughness Variability in the Honing Process of Steel Cylinders with CBN Metal Bonded Tools. Precision Engineering 35. 2011. pp.289-253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.11.004

[6] Burkhard G., Rehsteiner F., High Efficiency Abrasive Tool for Honing. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology V. 51. 1. 2002. pp.271-274.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61515-7

[7] Kundrák J., Alternative Machining Procedures of Hardened Steels, Manufacturing Technology V. 11, December 2011. pp.32-39 ISSN 1213-2489.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2011/a/1213-2489/mt/11/1/32

[8] Tóth T., Kundrák J., Gyáni K., The Removal Rate as a Parameter of Qualification for Hard Turning and Grinding. Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering. V. 1 and 2, Apr 13-17, 2004. Lausanne Switzerland, pp.629-639.

[9] Szabó O., Optimisation of Technology and Quasi Honing, of Polygon Bores, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, ELSEVIR, Dublin, 2001. 119. 1-3. pp.117-121.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00886-x

[10] Szabó O., Stability Criteria and Break out of Grains of Super-Hard of Grinding Tools. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, ELSEVIR, Dublin, 2004. 155-156. 1-3. p.2007-(2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.207

[11] Mamalis A.G., Kundrák J., Manolakos D.E., Gyáni K., Markopoulos A., Thermal Modelling of Surface Grinding Using Implicit Finite Element Techniques. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 21 (12), 2003. pp.929-934.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-002-1410-3