Comparison of the Natural Ageing Behaviour of EN AW 6082 and Lead Free EN AW 6023 Aluminium Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of solution annealing temperature (550 and 570°C) on the Vickers microhardness of the quenched and naturally aged states of EN AW 6082 and lead free aluminium alloy was investigated. The different chemical composition of analysed alloys did not affect the alloys microhardness after quenching. The total strengthening of both alloys was similar due to the same conjunction of the individual strengthening mechanism of alloys matrix after quenching. The microhardness of EN AW 6082 increased with ageing time increasing according to logarithmic dependence because the increment in alloy microhardness decreased with the increase in ageing time. On the contrary, microhardness of lead-free EN AW 6023 did not increase markedly either after 500 hours natural ageing. This alloy have very slow rate of natural ageing, probably due to suppressed diffusion of alloying elements and clusters and/or GP-zone formation in supersaturated solid solution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

125-128

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Information on http: /www. eaa. net, (The European Aluminium Association).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Rijkom, W.S. Miller, Proceedings of the 6th International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar, vol. 1, Aluminum Association, Washington, DC, 1996, 149-155.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Parson N., et al., Proceedings of the 7th International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar, vol. 1, Aluminum Association, Washington, DC, 2000, 1-12.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Faltus, K. Plaček, Aluminiumbegierung mit guter Spanbarkeit, European patent EP 9781069. 4-1270, Prioritat: CZ 09. 09. 96, CZ 2628-96.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Timelli, B. Bonollo, Materials Science and Technology 27 (1) (2011) 291-299.

Google Scholar

[6] N.C.W. Kuijpers, et al., Materials Characterization 49 (2003) 409-420.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Zajac, B. Bengtsson, Ch. Jönsson, Materials Science Forum 396-402 (2002) 399-404.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Sha, et al., Materials Science and Engineering A 304-306 (2001) 612-616.

Google Scholar

[9] N.C.W. Kuijpers, et al., Materials Science and Engineering A 394 (2005) 9-19.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Fujda, M. Vojtko, Acta Metallurgica Slovaca 13 (SI 1) (2007) 585-591.

Google Scholar

[11] C.D. Marioara, et al., Acta Materialia 51 (2003) 789-796.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Birol, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 173 (2006) 84-91.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Banhart, Advanced Engineering Materials 12 (7) (2010) 559-571.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Mrówka-Nowotnik, J. Sieniawski, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162-163 (2005) 367-372.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.115

Google Scholar

[15] I. Stulíková, J. Faltus, B. Smola, Kovové Materiály 45 (2) (2007) 85-90.

Google Scholar

[16] C. Wolverton, Acta Materialia 55 (17) (2007) 5867-5872.

Google Scholar