Micromechanical Modelling of Advanced Ceramics with Statistically Representative Synthetic Microstructures

Abstract:

Advanced ceramics are a class of material used in extreme conditions, such as high speed turning of aerospace alloys and rock drilling. Their high hardness makes them suitable for these uses, however their lower toughness means that failure due to fracture and chipping is a problem. They are composed of micron-sized particles of a primary hard phase together with either a ceramic or metallic matrix material. A combined experimental-numerical method was used to investigate the role of microstructure on the fracture of advanced ceramics. Two dimensional, statistically representative microstructures of the advanced ceramics are created using Voronoi tessellation. The synthetic microstructures are compared to real microstructures in terms of particle size distribution and particle aspect ratio. Simulation results indicate that the computed elastic parameters are within the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds and agree closely with analytical predictions made with the Eshelby-Mori-Tanaka method. It is found that the local stress and strain distribution within the model is significantly affected by the underlying microstructure, which in turn affects fracture properties. Hence, tailoring the microstructure can optimise the bulk strength parameters of the material.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 592-593)
• Pages: 137-140
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.592-593.137
• Online since: November 2013
• Authors: Patricia Alveen, Declan McNamara, Declan Carolan, Neal Murphy, Alojz Ivanković
• Keywords: Advanced Ceramics, Image Analysis, Microstructure, Voronoi Tessellation

References

[1] D. Carolan, P. Alveen, A. Ivanković, N. Murphy: Eng. Fract. Mech., 78 (2011) 2885-2895.

[2] D. Carolan, A. Ivanković, N. Murphy: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 32 (2012) 2581–2586.

[3] A.C.E. Reid, S.A. Langer, R.C. Lua, V.R. Coffman, S. Haan, R.E. García: Comput. Mater. Sci., 43(4) (2008) 989-999.

[4] M. Huang, Y. Li: Comput. Mater. Sci., 67 (2012) 63–72.

[5] M. Nygårds, P. Gudmundson: Comput. Mater. Sci., 24 (2002) 513–519.

[6] M. Kühn, M.O. Steinhauser: Appl. Phys. Lett., 93 (2008) 034102.

[7] H. Li, K. Li, G. Subhash, L.J. Kecskes, R.J. Dowding: Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 429 (2006) 115– 123.

[8] D. Carolan, P. Alveen, D. McNamara, N. Murphy, A. Ivankovic. 19th European Conference on Fracture, Kazan, Russia, August (2012).

[9] S. Beucher and C. Lantejoul. Proc. Int. Workshop Image Proc, pages 121–139, (1979).

[10] Luc Vincent and Pierre Soille. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 13(6): 583–598, (1991).

[11] L Vincent. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2(2): 176–201, (1993).

[12] Rafael C. Gonzalez, Richard E. Woods, and Steven L. Eddins. Digital image processing: using MATLAB. Prentice Hall, (2004).

[13] H. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, C. Fureby: Computers in Physics, 12 (1998) 620– 631.

[14] X. Chen, Y. Mai: J. Mater. Sci., 33 (1998) 3529–3539.

[15] G. P. Tandon and G. J. Weng: Compos. Sci. Technol., 27 (1986) 111–132.

[16] T. Mori and K. Tanaka: Acta Metall., 21 (1973) 571– 574.

[17] J.D. Eshelby: Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 241 (1957) 376–396.

[18] Z. Hashin, S. Shtrikman: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 11 (1963) 127–140.

[19] P. Wall: Applications of Mathematics, 42 (1997) 245–257.

[20] Z. Hashin: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 13 (1965)119–134.