Influence of Specimen Dimensions and Temperature on the Debinding Behavior of Alumina Feedstock

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work investigated the influence of specimen dimensions and temperature on the debinding behavior of alumina feedstock for powder injection process. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used as a based binder. It is soluble in water therefore the use of wax-based binder system can be avoided. PEGs with a molecular weight of 1500 and 4000 were mixed with polyvinyl butyral (PVB) a minor component. Stearic acid was added during feedstock preparation to act as a lubricant. Debinding process was carried out using a water leaching test at 30 and 70 °C to study for PEG removal rate. Specimens retained their shapes after leaching of the binders. In general, the rate of binder removal increased at initial stage then slowed down at longer leaching times. A faster debinding rate was achieved at 70 °C when compared to 30 °C. In addition, samples with a higher surface area to volume ratio (As/V) led to an increase in the %PEG removal rate. This study also showed the relationship between %PEG removal as a function of different surface area to volume ratio (As/V) which can be helpful in predicting %PEG removal for any other samples having cylindrical shape.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

170-174

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.T. Zaky, F.S. Soliman and A.S. Farag, Influence of paraffin wax characteristics on the formulation of wax-based binders and their debinding from green molded parts using two comparative techniques, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 209 (2009) 5981-5989.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.07.018

Google Scholar

[2] W. Liu, X. Yang, Z. Xie, C. Jia and L. Wang, Novel fabrication of injection-moulded ceramic parts with large section via partially water-debinding method, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32 (2012) 2187–2191.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.03.005

Google Scholar

[3] W.W. Yang, K.Y. Yang, M.C. Wang and M.H. Hon, Solvent debinding mechanism for alumina injection molded compacts with water-soluble binders, Ceram. Int. 29 (2003) 745-756.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-8842(02)00226-2

Google Scholar

[4] D.S. Tsai and W.W. Chen, Solvent Debinding Kinetics of Alumina Green Bodies by Powder Injection Molding, Ceram. Int. 21 (1995) 257-264.

DOI: 10.1016/0272-8842(95)99791-9

Google Scholar

[5] N. Chuankrerkkul, P. Sooksaen, P. Pakunthod, T. Kosalwit and W. Pinthong, Powder Injection Moulding of Alumina Using PEG/PVB Binder Systems, Key Eng. Mat. 545 (2013) 173-176.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.545.173

Google Scholar

[6] B. Zhu, X. Qu and Y. Tao, Mathematical model for condensed-solvent debinding process of PIM, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 142 (2003) 487-492.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00648-4

Google Scholar

[7] V.A. Krauss, A.M. Oliveira, A.N. Klein, H.A. Al-Qureshi and M.C. Fredel, A model for PEG removal from alumina injection moulded parts by solvent debinding, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 182 (2007) 268-273.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.08.004

Google Scholar