Improving the Current Stability through the Bubbles-Free Microfluidic Electro-Spray Ionizing Chip

Article Preview

Abstract:

The bubbles in the microfluidic based electro-spray ionizing chips seriously affect the performance of the system. This paper presents a bubble capture method to stabilize the current of the microfluidic based electro-spray ionizing sources. A bubble capture structure was introduced to collect the bubbles. A normal close clamp valve assured a suitable pressure in the bubble capture structure that no liquid in the microfluidic channel can enter; when the bubble capture structure was filled with gas bubbles, the clamp valve was opened to release the bubble and balance the pressure. The results indicated that the current fluctuation, which reflects the stability of the electro-spray ionizing devices, was below 1.8% during the stable cone-jet electro-spray stage (2000V~4500V) for the proposed system, which was a notable improvement comparing with normal microfluidic-based electro-spray ionizing chip without the bubble capture structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 609-610)

Pages:

637-641

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Koster, E. Verpoorte, A decade of microfluidic analysis coupled with electrospray mass spectrometry: An overview, Lab on a Chip. 7(2007) 1394-1412.

DOI: 10.1039/b709706a

Google Scholar

[2] Gary J. Van Berkel, Feimeng Zhou, Joseph T. Aroson, Changes in bulk solution pH caused by the inherent controlled-current electrolytic process of an electrospray ion source, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes. 162(1997) 55-67.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1176(96)04476-x

Google Scholar

[3] A. M. Skelley, J. Voldman, An active bubble trap and debubbler for microfluidic systems, Lab on a chip. 8(2008) 1733-1737.

DOI: 10.1039/b807037g

Google Scholar

[4] R. Wojcik, O. O. Dada, M. Sadilek, N. J. Dovichi, Simplified capillary electrophoresis nanospray sheath‐flow interface for high efficiency and sensitive peptide analysis, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry: RCM. 24(2004) 2554-2560.

DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4672

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Yang, S. Matsumoto, R. Maeda, A prototype of ultrasonic micro-degassing device for portable dialysis system, Sensor Actuat. A-phys. 95(2002) 274-280.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(01)00741-5

Google Scholar

[6] D. D. Meng, J. Kim, C. J. Kim, A degassing plate with hydrophobic bubble capture and distributed venting for microfluidic devices, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 16(2006) 419-424.

DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/16/2/028

Google Scholar

[7] W. Zheng, Z. Wang, W. Zhang, X. Jiang, A simple PDMS-based microfluidic channel design that removes bubbles for long-term on-chip culture of mammalian cells, Lab on a chip. 10(2010) 2906-2910.

DOI: 10.1039/c005274d

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Xia and George M. Whitesides, Soft lithography, Annual review of materials. 28(1998) 153-184.

Google Scholar

[9] John B. Fenn, Matthias Mann, Chin Kai Meng, Shek Fu Wong, C. M. Whitehouse, Electrospray ionization–principles and practice, Mass. Spectrom. Rev. 9(1990) 37-70.

DOI: 10.1002/mas.1280090103

Google Scholar