Influence of the Identification Procedure of the Yield Criterion on the Thickness Prediction of the Square Cup

Abstract:

The accuracy of the forming limit curves reported by the Marciniak-Kuczynski model as well as the quality of the predictions provided by the FE programs depend on the yield criterion that describes the anisotropic plastic behavior of the sheet metal. Two identification procedures of Barlat89 and BBC2005 are used in this paper. The first procedure is a conventional one well described in the literature [, while the second approach is developed by adding an experimental parameter determined in plane-strain state that allows establishing the exponent of the yield criteria. The mechanical response of the IF steel shows that the limit strains are strongly influenced by a small alteration of the yield surface. The influence of the yield criterion on the thickness predictions obtained in the simulation of a square cup deep drawing simulation is also studied.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 611-612)
• Pages: 70-75
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.70
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Liana Paraianu, Dan Sorin Comsa, Dorel Banabic*
• Keywords: Finite Element (FE) Simulation, Forming Limit Curve, Mechanical Parameters, Yield Criterion Identification Procedure

References

[1] R. Hill, A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society London A 193 (1948) 281–297.

[2] R. Hill, Theoretical plasticity of textured aggregates, Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 85 (1979) 179-191.

DOI: 10.1017/s0305004100055596

[3] R. Hill, Constitutive modelling of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 38 (1990) 405-417.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(90)90006-p

[4] W.F. Hosford, On yield loci of anisotropic cubic metals, Proc. 7th North American Metalworking Conference, Dearborn (1979) 191-197.

[5] F. Barlat, J. Lian, Plastic behaviour and stretchability of sheet metals (Part I): A yield function for orthotropic sheet under plane stress conditions. Int. J. Plast. 5, (1989) 51–56.

DOI: 10.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3

[6] D. Banabic, D.S. Comsa, M. Sester, M. Selig, W. Kubli, K. Mattiasson, M. Sigvant, Influence of constitutive equations on the accuracy of prediction in sheet metal forming simulation. In: Proceeding of the Numisheet Conference, Interlaken, Switzerland; (2008).

[7] D. Banabic, Sheet Metal Forming Processes. Constitutive modelling and numerical simulation, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, (2010).

[8] H. Aretz, O. S. Hopperstad, O.G. Lademo, Yield function calibration for orthotropic sheet metals based on uniaxial and plane strain tensile tests. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 186, (2007) 221–235.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.037

[9] P. Dasappa, K. Inal, R. Mishra, The effects of anisotropic yield functions and their material parameters on prediction of forming limit diagrams, Int. J. Solids Struct. 49, (2012) 3528–3550.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.021

[10] J. Gerlach, T. Beier, H. Grass, L. Heinle, L. Kessler, A. Lipp, Identification and validation of yield locus parameters with respect to industrial forming simulation needs. In: Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, SRI, Special Edition, Aachen, Germany, (2011).

[11] H. Vegter T.H. van den Boogaard, A plane stress yield function for anisotropic sheet material by interpolation of biaxial stress states. Int. J. Plast. 22, (2006) 557–580.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.009