On-Site Pull-Out Tests of Steel Anchor Spikes Applied to Brickwork Masonry

Article Preview

Abstract:

Externally Bonded (EB) composite materials are becoming a widespread solution for strengthening interventions on masonry buildings, even Cultural Heritage structures, due to several positive aspects mainly related to their high strength-to-weight ratio. In recent years, beside common epoxy-based Fibre-Reinforced Polymers (FRP), steel-based composites have been proposed: they are composed by unidirectional high-strength steel cords that can be coupled to either organic (Steel Reinforced Polymers, SRP) or inorganic (Steel Reinforced Grouts, SRG) matrices, in relation to their optimized spacing. The bond behaviour of all these EB composites has a strong influence over the effectiveness of interventions, since the detachment of reinforcements from the substrate generally represents the weaker failure mechanism. In order to improve this aspect, several anchorage devices have been proposed, being spikes, among them, one of the most suitable for masonry supports. Spikes are made of a bundle of fibres partly in the form of a bar, to be inserted and glued into a hole drilled in the substrate, and partly loose, to be spread and connected to reinforcement strips. Despite their importance also from a design point of view and considering the variety of shapes and materials, there are still few investigations in this field, being clear that both the spike-to-reinforcement and the spike-to-masonry connections need to be studied. Focused on the spike-to-masonry connection, this paper is aimed at investigating the performance of steel cord spikes applied to existing clay brick masonry, by means of overall 39 pull-out tests carried out taking into account the bonded length (equal to the hole depth), the type of embedding material and the number of steel cords forming the anchorage. The main results of this experimentation are herein presented and discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

266-274

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] U. Meier, Strengthening of structures using carbon fibre/epoxy composites, Constr Build Mater 9/6 (1995) 341-351.

Google Scholar

[2] C. Bakis, L.C. Bank, V. Brown, E. Cosenza, J.F. Davalos J.J. Lesko, A. Machida, S.H. Rizkalla, T.C. Triantafillou, Fiber-reinforced polymer composites for construction - State-of-the-Art review, J Compos Constr 6/2 (2002) 73-87.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73)

Google Scholar

[3] T. Triantafillou, Strengthening of masonry structures using epoxy-bonded FRP laminates, J Compos Constr 2/2 (1998) 96-104.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(1998)2:2(96)

Google Scholar

[4] N. G. Shrive, The use of fibre reinforced polymers to improve seismic resistance of masonry, Constr Build Mater 20 (2006) 269-277.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.030

Google Scholar

[5] T.C. Triantafillou, C.G. Papanicolaou, Textile Reinforced Mortars (TRM) versus Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) as Strengthening Materials of Concrete Structures, Proc. of the 7th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures - FRPRCS-7, Kansas City, USA, November 6-10, (2005).

DOI: 10.14359/14827

Google Scholar

[6] A. D'Ambrisi, L. Feo, F. Focacci, Experimental analysis on bond between PBO-FRCM strengthening materials and concrete, Compos Part B-Eng 44/1 (2013) 524-532.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.011

Google Scholar

[7] C.G. Papanicolaou, T.C. Triantafillou, K. Karlos, M. Papathanasiou, Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: in-plane cyclic loading. Mater Struct 40/10 (2007) 1081-1097.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9207-8

Google Scholar

[8] C.G. Papanicolaou, T.C. Triantafillou, M. Papathanasiou, K. Karlos, Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading. Mater Struct 41/1 (2008) 143-157.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-007-9226-0

Google Scholar

[9] M.R. Valluzzi, F. da Porto, E. Garbin, M. Panizza, Out-of-plane strengthening of infill masonry walls with composites materials, Proc. 12th Canadian Masonry Symposium – CMS2013, Vancouver (Canada), June 2-5 (2013).

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-014-0384-6

Google Scholar

[10] L. Garmendia, P. Larrinaga, D. García, I. Marcos, Textile-Reinforced Mortar as Strengthening Material for Masonry Arches. Int J Archit Herit, 8/5 (2014) 627-648.

DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2012.704480

Google Scholar

[11] C. Menna, D. Asprone, C. Ferone, F. Colangelo, A. Balsamo, A. Prota, R. Cioffi, G. Manfredi, Use of geopolymers for composite external reinforcement of RC members, Compos Part B-Eng 45/1 (2013) 1667-1676.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.019

Google Scholar

[12] S. Tamburini, M. Favaro, A. Magro, E. Garbin, M. Panizza, F. Nardon, M.R. Valluzzi, Geopolymers as strengthening materials for Built Heritage. In: Proc. of Built Heritage 2013: Monitoring Conservation Management, Milan (Italy), November 18-20 (2013).

Google Scholar

[13] E. Garbin, M. Panizza, M.R. Valluzzi, F. Nardon, S. Tamburini, M. Favaro, A. Magro, Characterization of Fibre Reinforced Geopolymers as structural strengthening material for brick masonry, Proc. 9th Int. Masonry Conference - IMC9, Guimarães (Portugal), July 7-9 (2014).

DOI: 10.23967/sahc.2021.110

Google Scholar

[14] X. Huang, V. Birman, A. Nanni, G. Tunis, Properties and potential for application of steel reinforced polymer and steel reinforced grout composites, Compos Part B-Eng 36/1 (2005) 73-82.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-8368(03)00080-5

Google Scholar

[15] F. Ceroni, M. Pecce, Cracking behaviour of RC beams externally strengthened with emerging materials, Constr Build Mater 21/4 (2007) 736-745.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.013

Google Scholar

[16] A. Borri, P. Casadei, G. Castori, J. Hammond, Strengthening of brick masonry arches with externally bonded steel reinforced composites, J Compos Constr 13/6 (2009) 468-475.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000030

Google Scholar

[17] P. Girardello, Rinforzo di volte in muratura con materiali compositi innovativi, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Padova, Italy (2013). In Italian.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Khalifa, T. Alkhrdaji, A. Nanni, S. Lansburg, Anchorage of surface mounted FRP reinforcement, Concrete International: Design and Construction, 21/10 (1999) 49-54.

Google Scholar

[19] F. Ceroni, M. Pecce, S. Matthys, L. Taerwe, Debonding strength and anchorage devices for reinforced concrete elements strengthened with FRP sheets, Compos Part B-Eng 39/3 (2008) 429-441.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.05.002

Google Scholar

[20] H.W. Zhang, S.T. Smith, Influence of FRP anchor fan configuration and dowel angle on anchoring FRP plates, Compos Part B-Eng 43/8 (2013) 3516-3527.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.072

Google Scholar

[21] S.V. Grelle, L.H. Sneed, Review of anchorage systems for externally bonded FRP laminates. Int. J. of Concrete Structures and Materials 7/1 (2013) 17-33.

DOI: 10.1007/s40069-013-0029-0

Google Scholar

[22] R. Kalfat, R. Al-Mahaidi, S.T. Smith, Anchorage devices used to improve the performance of reinforced concrete beams retrofitted with FRP composites: State-of-the-art review, J Compos Constr 17/1 (2013) 14-33.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000276

Google Scholar

[23] ACI 440. 2R-08, Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures, American Concrete Institute (2008).

DOI: 10.14359/51700867

Google Scholar

[24] CNR DT-200, Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Existing Structures, Italian National Research Council (2004).

Google Scholar

[25] ACI 440. 7R-10, Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Systems for Strengthening Unreinforced Masonry Structures, American Concrete Institute (2010).

DOI: 10.14359/51663675

Google Scholar

[26] G. Baronio, L. Binda, F. Cantoni, P. Rocca, Outdoor models to assess the durability of masonry, Masonry International 6/2 (1992) 50-53.

Google Scholar

[27] Guidelines for assessment and improvement of connections in buildings, Final Report D10. 2, New integrated knowledge based approaches to the protection of cultural heritage from earthquake-induced risk - NIKER, Contract FP7-ENV-2009-1 n. 244123 (2012).

Google Scholar