Enhancing the Seismic Resistance of Columns by GFRP Confinement Using Flexible Adhesive-Experimental Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the results of two experiments, focused on testing the effectiveness of a method of enhancing the seismic (dynamic) resistance of masonry columns with the use of flexible polymer adhesive, are shown. The first experiment was devoted to investigate the damping properties of a polymer working between two stiff layers, whereas the aim of the second one was to verify if the identified damping properties of the polymer can improve the dynamic behaviour of short masonry columns (prisms) strengthened by confinement made of GFRP grid bonded by the polymer adhesive. The results of the first stage of experimental investigation indicate that bonding two stiff elements with the analyzed polymer adhesive leads to the significant increase in overall damping properties. The results of the second experiment show that the GFRP grid confinement with flexible polymer adhesive is more effective than stiff epoxy and mineral adhesives.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

478-485

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Mahmoud, R. Jankowski, Elastic and inelastic multi-storey buildings under earthquake excitation with the effect of pounding, Journal of Applied Sciences 9 (2009) 3250-3262.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2009.3250.3262

Google Scholar

[2] R. Jankowski, Assessment of damage due to earthquake-induced pounding between the main building and the stairway tower, Key Engineering Materials 347 (2007) 339-344.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.347.339

Google Scholar

[3] R. Jankowski, Non-linear FEM analysis of pounding-involved response of buildings under non-uniform earthquake excitation, Engineering Structures 37 (2012) 99-105.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.035

Google Scholar

[4] M.A. Aiello, F. Micelli, L. Valente, FRP Confinement of square masonry columns, ASCE J. Composites for Construction 13 (2009) 148-158.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2009)13:2(148)

Google Scholar

[5] M. Corradi, A. Grazini, A. Borri, Confinement of brick masonry columns with CFRP materials, Composites Science and Technology 67 (2007) 1772-1783.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.002

Google Scholar

[6] A. Kwiecień, B. Zając, R. Jankowski, Static and dynamic properties of a flexible joint working in cracked historical masonries. 6th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historic Construction, Bath, UK, 2008, Vol. 2, pp.931-939.

DOI: 10.1201/9781439828229.ch106

Google Scholar

[7] T. Falborski, R. Jankowski, A. Kwiecień, Experimental study on polymer mass used to repair damaged structures. Key Engineering Materials 488-489 (2012) 347-350.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.488-489.347

Google Scholar

[8] N. Lasowicz, R. Jankowski, Numerical analysis of a temporary steel grandstand, in: Shell Structures: Theory and Applications, CRC/Balkema, Leiden, Netherlands, 2014, pp.543-546.

DOI: 10.1201/b15684-136

Google Scholar

[9] A. Kwiecień, B. Zając, Energy approach in analysis of masonry columns confined with GFRP mesh bonded on stiff and flexible adhesives, in: Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, 2012, DWE, Wrocław, Poland, pp.1864-1872.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Kwiecień, B. Zając, Dynamic response of the cracked masonry building repaired with the Flexible Joint Method – an innovative earthquake protection, Proc. 7th International Conference on Structural Dynamics EURODYN, Southampton, UK, 2008, paper E 2.

Google Scholar

[11] R. Jankowski, Nonlinear rate dependent model of high damping rubber bearing, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1 (2003) 397-403.

DOI: 10.1023/b:beee.0000021512.74990.45

Google Scholar

[12] S. Mahmoud, P-E. Austrell, R. Jankowski, Simulation of the response of base-isolated buildings under earthquake excitations considering soil flexibility, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 11 (2012) 359-374.

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-012-0127-z

Google Scholar