Calibration for Laser Scanners Based on the NIM 80m Indoor Ranging Facility

Abstract:

Laser scanners have become very popular means of point clouds acquisition and 3D reconstruction. However, the accuracy specifications given by laser scanner producers in their publications and pamphlets are not consistent. Experience shows that sometimes these should not be trusted. Therefore, how to reasonably evaluate and quantify main technical parameters of the instruments is particularly important. It is very necessary to investigate in calibration devices and methods that are suitable for laser scanners. The 80m indoor ranging facility of the National Institute of Metrology (NIM) at Beijing, China, is equipped with an interferometer comparator, precise air flotation rail systems and environmental parameter automatical compensation system. The facility is a closed loop feedback control system and can provide a high-precision reference distance value with different intervals. A expanded standard uncertainty (k=2) of U(L_s) is superior to 0.5μm+0.5×10^-6L. This paper describes the calibration principle and procedure, including mounting white standard spheres with surfaces of diffuse reflection at the mobile platform as non-contact targets, scanning and measuring the white spheres , fitting the coordinates of the sphere centers and calculating the relative distance among sphere centers. As an example, this paper also presents analysis and evaluation on the measurement uncertainty of ranging accuracy.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 625)
• Pages: 14-19
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.625.14
• Online since: August 2014
• Authors: Xiang Rui Deng*, Zheng Yu Qian, Jian Shuang Li
• Keywords: 80m Indoor Ranging Facility, Calibration, Laser Scanners, Measurement Uncertainty, Precision Metrology, Ranging Error

References

[1] Thomas P. KERSTEN, Klaus MECHELKE, Maren LINDSTAEDT and Harald STERNBERG, Germany, Geometric Accuracy Investigations of the Latest Terrestrial Laser Scanning Systems, 2008, Information on http: /www. hcu-hamburg. de/geomatik.

DOI: 10.1127/1432-8364/2009/0023

[2] Balzani, M., Pellegrinelli, A., Perfetti, N. and Uccelli, F., 2001. A terrestrial laser scanner: accuracy tests. In Proceedings of 18th International Symposium CIPA 2001. Potsdam, Germany, September 18 – 21, p.445 – 453.

[3] Boehler, W., Bordas Vicent, M. & A. Marbs (2003): Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy. Proceedings of XIXth CIPA Symposium, Antalya, Turkey, Sept. 30 – Oct. 4.

[4] Lichti, D.D., Stewart, M.P., Tsakiri, M., Snow, A.J., 2000: Calibration and testing of a terrestrial laser scanner. Int. Arch. of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. XXXIII, Part B5, pp.485-492.

[5] ASME B89. 4. 19-2006 Standard—Performance Evaluation of Laser-Based Spherical Coordinate Measurement Systems, Information on http: /www. asme. org.

[6] Cheok, G. S., Leigh, S., and Rukhin, A., 2002. Calibration Experiments of a Laser Scanner, NISTIR 6922, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, September. URL: http: /www. bfrl. nist. gov/861/CMAG/publications/NISTIR_calibration_6922. pdf. 143.

DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.6922

[7] Cheok, G. S. (Ed. ), 2003. Proceedings of the LADAR Calibration Facility Workshop, June 12 – 13. NISTIR 7044, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, October. URL: http: /www. bfrl. nist. gov/861/CMAG/publications/index. htm.

DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.7054

[8] Cheok, G. S. (Ed. ), 2005. Proceedings of the 2nd NIST LADAR Performance Evaluation Workshop, March 15 – 16. NISTIR 7266, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, October. URL: http: /www. bfrl. nist. gov/861/CMAG/publications/index. htm.

DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.7266

[9] C. Witzgall, G. S. Cheok, and A. J. Kearsley, Recovering Circles and Spheres from Point Data, in Perspectives In Operations Research, F. B. Alt, M. C. Fu, and B. L. Golden, Eds. New York: Springer, 2006, pp.393-413.

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-39934-8_22

[10] Lytle, A. M., Cheok, G. S., and Saidi, K. S.

[2007] ASTM E-57 3D Imaging Systems Committee - An Update of the Standards Development Effort, in Laser Radar Technology and Applications XII, edited by G. W. Kamerman and M. D. Turner, Proceedings of SPIE, April.

DOI: 10.1117/12.724770

[11] Cheok, G. S., Lytle, A. M., and Saidi, K. S.

[2008] ASTM E-57 3D Imaging Systems Committee: An Update, in Laser Radar Technology and Applications XIII, edited by M. D. Turner and G. W. Kamerman, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 6950 (2008), March 19-20.

DOI: 10.1117/12.791929

[12] ASTM E2544-08b, Standard Terminology for Three-Dimensional (3D) Imaging Systems, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Information on http: /www. astm. org.

[13] Marek Franaszek, Geraldine S. Cheok, and Christoph Witzgall, 2011. Fast automatic registration of range images from 3D imaging systems using sphere targets, URL: www. bfrl. nist. gov/861/CMAG/.. /Fast_Auto_Reg_final. pdf‎.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.08.003

[14] M. Franaszek G.S. Cheok K.S. Saidi, and Witzgall, Fitting Spheres to Range Data From 3-D Imaging Systems, IEEE Trans, Instrum. Meas., vol. 58 (2009), pp.3544-3553.

DOI: 10.1109/tim.2009.2018011

[15] Geraldine S. Cheok, Kamel S. Saidi, Marek Franaszek, 2011. Target Penetration of Laser-Based 3D Imaging Systems, Information on http: /www. astm. org.

[16] JCGM 2008 Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, URL: http: /www. bipm. org/en/publications/guides/gum. html.