High Efficiency Tool Path Generation for Freeform Surface Machining Based on NURBS Subdivision

Article Preview

Abstract:

Along with the rapid development of CAD/CAM system, the smooth surfaces are widely used in industry design. Especially NURBS surface attracts rising attentions because NURBS can describe flat surface, freeform surface and so on. Currently a lot of tool path generation patterns are proposed for milling process of freeform surface. Nevertheless there are still some problems on generating efficient tool path for freeform surface under the requested surface finish roughness. In this research, in order to resolve these problems, NURBS surface is divided into some patches and the tool path is generated on each patch. This paper proposes a surface divide method and makes a comparison between this method and undivided method. As a result, it is found that dividing the surface is helpful for the making shorter tool path and increase the machining efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

372-377

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z. Haranud, J. Zhu, T. Tanaka, Y. Saito, Optimal Tool Path Generation Method for Freeform Surface Machining, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st Century, Osaka, Japan, 2009, pp.3-8.

DOI: 10.1299/jsmelem.2009.5.3

Google Scholar

[2] M. Dowell, P. Jarratt, A Modified Regula Falsi Method for Computing the Root of an Equation, Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 11, Issue 2, 1971, pp.168-174.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01934364

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Narabu, Z. Haranud, J. Zhu, T. Tanaka, Y. Saito, Optimal Tool-path Selection for Milling Free-form Surface Based on the Form of Surface, Proceeding of 3rd International Conference of Asian Society for precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, 2009, Kita Kyusyu, Japan, CD Proceeding, 1A1-13.

DOI: 10.1299/jsmemecjo.2009.4.0_281

Google Scholar