Hybrid Model for Measurement of Building Vulnerability

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper a hybrid model for measurement of building vulnerability caused by strong motion arrays is proposed. Our model is based on is a multi-disciplinary method that will predict the behavior of a building structure in reaction to unforeseen stress. In addition, we classify the already proposed vulnerability assessment methods and we describe the criteria for the appropriate selection of building vulnerability assessment method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

237-242

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lang, K., Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings, Dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ÉPFZ), Zurich (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Calvi, G.M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J.J., Restrepo Vélez, L.F., Crowley, H., The development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years, ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, Paper No. 472, 43(3) (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] Giovinazzi S., Lagomarsino S., Damage Assessment of current buildings at territorial scale: Model calibrated on a macroseismic vulnerability model, Interdisciplinary Workshop on management of Earthquake Risks, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, August 28-29 (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z

Google Scholar

[4] Restrepo Vélez, L.F., MAGENES G., Simplified Procedure for the Seismic Risk Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2561 (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] Foerster E., Krien Y., Dandoulaki M., Priest S., Tapsell S., Delmonaco G., Margottini C., Bonadonna C., Methodologies to assess vulnerability of structural systems, ENSURE PROJECT, WP1: State-of-the-art on vulnerability types, 3 (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] Dumova-Jovanoska, E., Fragility Curves for RC Structures in Skopje Region, Proceedings of the 13th World Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Vancouver, Canada, 3 (2004).

Google Scholar

[7] Cardinali, M., Reichenbach, P., Guzzetti, F., Ardizzone, F., Antonini, G., Galli, M., Cacciano, M., Castellani, M., and Salvati, P.: A geomorphological approach to estimate landslide hazard and risk in urban and rural areas in Umbria, central Italy, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2: 1–2 (2002).

DOI: 10.5194/nhess-2-57-2002

Google Scholar

[8] Reichenbach S, Dieppe PA Williams S, Gregg P, et al,. Assessing bone loss on radiographs of the knee in osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study. Arthritis and Rheumatism 52(11) (2005) 3536-3541.

DOI: 10.1002/art.21418

Google Scholar

[9] T. Chanpheng, H. Yamada, H. Katsuchi, E. Sasaki, Nonlinear features for damage detection on large civil structures due to earthquakes, (2012).

DOI: 10.1177/1475921712437182

Google Scholar

[10] K. D'Souza, B. I Epureanu, Damage detection in nonlinear systems using system augmentation and generalized minimum rank perturbation theory, (2005).

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/14/5/037

Google Scholar

[11] Charles R. Farrar et al., Nonlinear System Identification for Damage Detection, (2007).

Google Scholar