Morphology of Roman, Islamic and Medieval Seismic Design: Pointed Arch and Ablaq

Article Preview

Abstract:

In ancient written sources earthquakes were mostly interpreted as a divine punishment for human sins, only few authors instead interpreted the seismic event as a phenomenon independent from human actions. Considering the built architectures as material documents, several examples can be found, suggesting that there was an empyrical knowledge of the consequences of earthquakes on buildings. Modern literature on the topic, mostly within engineering studies, lacking an historical approach, assumes that in ancient times science ignored the physical nature of seismic events and consequently declares that architects couldn’t consider dynamics in their projects. The close examination of some examples shows clearly that Roman, Islamic and Medieval architects had an empirical knowledge of dynamics, probably based on post-seismic reconstruction. This knowledge developed through history, so it is possible to outline a history of seismic design way before the Lisbon earthquake (1775), considered by many authors as the beginning of the history of seismic design.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

9-14

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Reitherman, Earthquakes and Engineers: An International History, American Society of Civil Engineers Press, Reston VA, (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Di Pasquale, L'arte del costruire. Tra conoscenza e scienza, Marsilio, Venezia, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] b] Pirro Ligorio, Libro o trattato de diversi terremoti raccolti da diversi autori per Pyrro Ligorio cittadino romano, 1570, Archivio di Stato di Torino, Codici ligoriani, vol. 28, cod. Ja. II. 15.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Giuffrè, La meccanica dell'architettura. La statica, NIS, Roma, (1986).

Google Scholar

[4] E. Guidoni, A. Casamento (a cura di), Le città ricostruite dopo il terremoto siciliano del 1693: tecniche e significati delle progettazioni urbane, Kappa, Roma, (1997).

Google Scholar

[5] C.F. Giuliani, Provvedimenti antisismici nell'antichità, Journal of Ancient Topography. 21 (2011) 25-52.

Google Scholar

[6] L.C. Lancaster, Concrete Vaulted Construction in Imperial Rome, CUP, Cambridge, 2005, 124.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Guidoboni, G. Ferrari, D. Mariotti, A. Comastri, G. Tarabusi and G. Valensise, CFTI4Med, Catalogue of Strong Earthquakes in Italy (461 B.C. -1997) and Mediterranean Area (760 B.C. -1500), INGV-SGA, (2007).

DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0091-9

Google Scholar

[8] C.M. Amici, L'uso del ferro nelle strutture romane, Materiali e Strutture. 2-3 (1997) 85-95.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Giuffrè, Monumenti e terremoti: aspetti statici del restauro, Multigrafica, Roma, (1988).

Google Scholar

[10] A. Ceccotti, P. Faccio, M. Nart, C. Sandhass, P. Simeone, Seismic behaviour of historic timber-frame buildings in the Italian Dolomites, In: Why Save Historic Timber Structures? Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of the IIWC, Istanbul, Turkey, September 20th (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] A. Bayraktar, H. Keypour, A. Naderzadeh, Application of Ancient Earthquake Resistant Method in Modern Construction Technology, XVth WCEE proceedings, Lisboa (2012).

Google Scholar

[12] A. Naderzadeh, Application of Seismic Base Isolation Technology in Iran, Menshin. 63, 2 (2009) 40-47.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Naderzadeh, Historical Aspects of Seismic Base Isolation Application, Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Seismic Response Controlled Buildings for Sustainable Society, 16-18 Sept. 2009, JSSI, Tokyo, Japan.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Montali, L'anfiteatro di Sabratha: vecchie indagini e nuove ricerche, THIASOS rivista di archeologia e architettura antica. 1 (2012) 127-142.

Google Scholar

[15] G. Strappa, Unità dell'organismo architettonico. Note sulla formazione e trasformazione dei caratteri degli edifici, Dedalo, Bari, (1995).

Google Scholar

[16] A. Camiz, Storia dell'urbanistica di Ravenna nel Medioevo, In: S. Benedetti (Ed. ), Bollettino del Centro di Studi per la storia dell'architettura. Gli studi di storia dell'architettura nelle ricerche dei dottorati italiani. 42-43-44 (2009).

DOI: 10.1017/s0021853700031479

Google Scholar

[17] C.F. Giuliani, Provvedimenti antisismici nell'antichità, Journal of Ancient Topography. 21 (2011) 25-52.

Google Scholar

[18] Procopius, Περί Κτισμάτων, II, 8.

Google Scholar

[19] G. Caniggia, Metodologia del recupero e studio della tipologia processuale nell'indagine e nel piano: tipologia edilizia di Venzone, In: Il recupero dei vecchi centri. Gli aspetti teorici, i modi d'intervento, Atti del convegno, 1981, Tarcento, (1983).

DOI: 10.4129/cns2008.034

Google Scholar

[20] C. D'Amato Guerrieri, G. Strappa (Eds. ), Gianfranco Caniggia dalla lettura di Como all'interpretazione tipologica della città, M. Adda, Bari, (2002).

Google Scholar

[20] A. Camiz, Venzone, a city rebuilt (almost) where it was and how it was,. Paesaggio Urbano. 5-6 (2012) 18-25.

Google Scholar