Property Optimization of Inorganic Silicon Aluminum Polymer Based on Quadratic Regression and Orthogonal Design

Article Preview

Abstract:

Because of the dosage of metakaolin and ash fly had a big impact on the performance optimization of inorganic silicon aluminum polymer, using of metakaolin and ash fly can optimize the pore structure and hydration products of inorganic silicon aluminum polymer paste, how to determine the dosage of metakaolin and ash fly of inorganic silicon aluminum polymer reasonably and directly has become a problem in this research needed to be resolved instantly at hand. The current study investigated the relationship between the amounts of metakaolin and fly ash added and the compressive strength of the inorganic silicon aluminum polymer paste, and then established relevant mathematical model using a quadratic regression quadrature combination design. Previous studies have shown that the addition of 13.56% metakaolin and 3% fly ash would be the optimal plan, and that 57.4 MPa would be the maximum value of the compressive strength of the cement paste of inorganic silicon aluminum polymer that could be obtained. Keywords: Inorganic silicon aluminum polymer; Property Optimization; Quadratic Regression and Orthogonal Design

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 629-630)

Pages:

510-517

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] MEHTA P K. Greening of the concrete industry for sustainable development[J]. Concrete Internatianal, 2002, July: 23-28.

Google Scholar

[2] ROY D M. Alkali-activated cements Opportunities and challenges [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, 29: 249-254.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00093-3

Google Scholar

[3] SHI Cai-jun, JIMENEZ A F, PALOMO A. New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 41: 750-763.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016

Google Scholar

[4] IZQUIERDO M, QUEROL X, DAVIDOVITS J, ANTENUCCIC D, NUGTEREND H, PEREIRAE C F. Coal fly ash-slag-based geopolymers: Microstructure and metal leaching [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166: 561-566.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.063

Google Scholar

[5] TAILBY J, MACKENZIE K J D. Structure and mechanical properties of aluminosilicate geopolymer composites with Portland cement and its constituent minerals [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40: 787-794.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.12.003

Google Scholar

[6] OH J E, MONTEIRO P J M, JUN S S, CHOI S, CLARK S M. The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymers [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40: 189-196.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.010

Google Scholar

[7] RAVIKUMAR D, PEETHAMPARAN S, NEITHALATH N. Structure and strength of NaOH activated concretes containing fly ash or GGBFS as the sole binder [J]. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2010, 32: 399-410.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.03.007

Google Scholar

[8] PROVIS J L, DEVENTER J S J V. Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic silicon aluminum polymers. 2: the gel binder [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2009, 44: 620-631.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-008-3078-z

Google Scholar

[9] RATTANASAK U, CHINDAPRASIRT P. Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis of fly ash geopolymer [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2009, 22: 1073-1078.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2009.03.022

Google Scholar

[10] BELL J L, DRIEMEYER P E, KRIVEN W M. Formation of Ceramics from Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers: Part I—Cs-Based Geopolymer [J]. Journal of America Ceramic Society, 2009, 92: 1-8.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02790.x

Google Scholar

[11] LI Chao, SUN Heng-hu, LI Long-tu. A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si+Ca) and metakaolin (Si+Al) cements [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40: 1341-1349.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.03.020

Google Scholar

[12] DUXSON P, JIMENEZ A F, PROVIS J L, LUKEY G C, PALOMO A, DEVENTER J S J V. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2007, 42: 2917-2933.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z

Google Scholar

[13] KUMAR S, KUMAR R, MEHROTRA S P. Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2010, 45: 607-615.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-009-3934-5

Google Scholar

[14] GUO Xiao-lu, SHI Hui-sheng, CHEN Li-ming, DICK W A. Alkali-activated complex binders from class C fly ash and Ca-containing admixtures [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 173: 480-486.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.110

Google Scholar

[15] DUXSON P, PROVIS J L, LUKEY G C. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2005, 269: 47-58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060

Google Scholar

[16] MACKENZIE K J D, OLEARY B. Inorganic polymers (geopolymers) containing acid–base indicators as possible colour-change humidity indicators [J]. Materials Letters, 2009, 63: 230-232.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.09.053

Google Scholar