Fracture Prediction in Sheet Metal Stamping Based on a Modified Ductile Fracture Criterion

Article Preview

Abstract:

Sheet metal stamping is an important manufacturing process because of its high production rate and low cost, so the fracture prediction of stamping parts has become important issues. Recent experimental studies have shown that the quality of stamping parts can be increased by using ductile fracture criteria. This paper proposed a modified ductile fracture criterion based on the macroscopic and microscopic continuum damage mechanics (CDM). Three-dimensional (3D) explicit finite element analysis (FEA) are performed to predict the fracture behaviors of sheet metal stamping process. An approach to determine the material constants of modified ductile fracture criterion is presented with the help of uniaxial tensile tests and compressive tests. The results show that the modified ductile fracture criterion enables precise cup depth and fracture location of sheet metal stamping under nonlinear paths. Compared with typical ductile fracture criteria, the results predicted with modified ductile fracture criterion correlate the best with the experimental data.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

543-550

Citation:

Online since:

March 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Li, P. Hu, Y. Cao, J. Wang: Section analysis of industrial sheet-metal stamping processes. In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology 120, 2002, pp.37-44.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)01040-8

Google Scholar

[2] A.V. Rao, N. Ramakrishnan, R.K. Kumar: A comparative evaluation of the theoretical failure criteria for workability in cold forging. In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology 140, 2003, pp.29-42.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00432-1

Google Scholar

[3] A.M. Freudenthal: Safety and the Probability of Structural Failure. In: American Society of Civil Engineers Transactions 121, 1956, pp.1337-1397.

DOI: 10.1061/taceat.0007306

Google Scholar

[4] M.G. Cockroft, D.J. Latham: Ductility and the workability of metals. In: Journal of the Institute of Metals 96, 1968, pp.33-39.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Brozzo, B. DeLuca, R. Rendina: A new method for the prediction of formability limits in metal sheets, sheet metal forming and formability. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of the International Deep Drawing Research Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1972: pp.9-13.

Google Scholar

[6] S.I. Oh, C.C. Chen, S. Kobayashi: Ductile Fracture in Axisymmetric Extrusion and Drawing—Part 2: Workability in Extrusion and Drawing. In: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 101, 1979, pp.36-44.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3439471

Google Scholar

[7] D.M. Norris, J.E. Reaugh, B. Moran, D.F. Quinnones: A plastic-strain, mean-stress criterion for ductile fracture. In: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 100, 1978, pp.279-286.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3443491

Google Scholar

[8] Y.K. Ko, J.S. Lee, H. Huh, H.K. Kim, S.H. Park: Prediction of fracture in hub-hole expanding process using a new ductile fracture criterion. In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology 187-188, 2007, pp.358-362.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.071

Google Scholar

[9] V. Vujovic, A. Shabaik: A new workability criterion for ductile materials. In: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 108, 1986, pp.245-249.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3225876

Google Scholar

[10] A.S. Argon, J. Im, R. Safoglu: Cavity Formation from Inclusions Inductile Fracture. In: Metallurgical Transactions A 6, 1975, pp.825-837.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02672306

Google Scholar

[11] M. He, F. Li, Z. Wang: Forming limit stress diagram prediction of aluminum alloy 5052 based on GTN model parameters determined by in situ tensile test. In: Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 24, 2011, pp.378-386.

DOI: 10.1016/s1000-9361(11)60045-9

Google Scholar

[12] F.A. McClintock: A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. In: Journal of Applied Mechanics 35, 1968, pp.363-371.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3601204

Google Scholar

[13] J.R. Rice, D. Tracey: On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. In: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 17, 1969, pp.201-217.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7

Google Scholar

[14] A.L. Gurson: Continuum Theory of Ductile Rupture by Void Nucleation and Growth—Part 1: Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. In: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-Transactions of the ASME, 99, 1977, pp.2-15.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3443401

Google Scholar

[15] V. Tvergaard: Influence of voids on shear and instabilities under plane strain conditions. In: International Journal of Fracture, 17, 1981, pp.389-407.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00036191

Google Scholar

[16] A. Needleman, V. Tvergaard: An analysis of ductile rupture in notched bars. In: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 32, 1984, pp.461-490.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-0

Google Scholar

[17] J. Lemaitre: A Continuous Damage Mechanics Model for Ductile Fracture. In: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 107, 1985, pp.83-89.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3225775

Google Scholar