Challenges and Process Strategies Concerning Multi-Pass Double Sided Incremental Forming

Article Preview

Abstract:

The design domain of Double Sided Incremental Forming (DSIF) can be enhanced through the use of multipass strategies. The chosen tool gap in multipass DSIF, or multi-DSIF, is dependent on the estimated thickness of the sheet being formed, which is traditionally done through the Sine Law. In this work, a simple modification to the Sine Law is performed so as to prevent the tool gap from approaching zero at regions where the part contains a near vertical wall. Additionally, various multipass strategies regarding the design of the intermediate stages were trialed in an effort to increase geometric accuracy. Increasing the depth between subsequent stages of DSIF was found to provide the best results due to the accommodation of rigid body motion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

1122-1127

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Malhotra, J. Cao, F. Ren, V. Kiridena, Z. Cedric Xia, and N. V. Reddy, Improvement of Geometric Accuracy in Incremental Forming by Using a Squeezing Toolpath Strategy With Two Forming Tools, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 133 (2011) 061019-9.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4005179

Google Scholar

[2] H. Meier, C. Magnus, and V. Smukala, Impact of superimposed pressure on dieless incremental sheet metal forming with two moving tools, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 60 (2011) 327–330.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.134

Google Scholar

[3] J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramley, J. Duflou, and J. Allwood, Asymmetric Single Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 54 (2005) 88–114.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60021-3

Google Scholar

[4] J. R. Duflou, J. Verbert, B. Belkassem, J. Gu, H. Sol, C. Henrard, and A. M. Habraken, Process window enhancement for single point incremental forming through multi-step toolpaths, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 57 (2008) 253–256.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.030

Google Scholar

[5] M. Skjoedt, M. B. Silva, P. a F. Martins, and N. Bay, Strategies and limits in multi-stage single-point incremental forming, J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 45 (2010) 33–44.

DOI: 10.1243/03093247jsa574

Google Scholar

[6] R. Malhotra, A. Bhattacharya, A. Kumar, N. V. Reddy, and J. Cao, A new methodology for multi-pass single point incremental forming with mixed toolpaths, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 60 (2011) 323–326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.145

Google Scholar

[7] D. Xu, R. Malhotra, N. V. Reddy, J. Chen, and J. Cao, Analytical prediction of stepped feature generation in multi-pass single point incremental forming, J. Manuf. Process. 14 (2012) 487–494.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.08.003

Google Scholar

[8] H. Meier, V. Smukala, O. Dewald, and J. Zhang, Two Point Incremental Forming with Two Moving Forming Tools, Key Eng. Mater. 344 (2007) 599–605.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.344.599

Google Scholar

[9] M. Bambach, A geometrical model of the kinematics of incremental sheet forming for the prediction of membrane strains and sheet thickness, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210 (2010) 1562–1573.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.003

Google Scholar

[10] T. Kim and D. Yang, Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 42 (2000) 1271–1286.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00047-8

Google Scholar

[11] K. Jackson and J. Allwood, The mechanics of incremental sheet forming, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (2009) 1158–1174.

Google Scholar

[12] J. Jeswiet, Asymmetric Incremental Sheet Forming, Adv. Mater. Res. 6–8 (2005) 35–58.

Google Scholar

[13] M. B. Silva, M. Skjoedt, G. Atkins, N. Bay, and P. F. Martins, Single-point incremental forming and formability–failure diagrams, J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 43 (2008) 15–35.

DOI: 10.1243/03093247jsa340

Google Scholar