Shape Factors and Feasibility of Sheet Metal Hydroformed Components

Abstract:

The authors have investigated, in other paper, the problem related to the definition of a “set of shape factors” in order to declare the feasibility of a product through sheet hydroforming. In particular the defined shape factors are three different a-dimensional coefficients by which it is possible to declare the feasibility of a product through the calculation, in different sections, of the three previous shape factors. The robustness of this methodology is related to the correct calculation of the “limit value” of each shape factor. In fact the feasibility is reached if, in any section, the calculated shape factors are higher than their respective limit values. In this paper the authors have performed an extensive numerical and experimental campaign, taking into account a different geometry respect to that of the first paper, in order to: re-calculate the limit value for each shape factor and, then, verify the correctness of the limit values exposed in the previous first paper. The numerical campaign has been used, after the evaluation of the accuracy of the numerical model, in order to study the feasibility of the product without engaging the hydroforming machine. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) has been extensively used in order to investigate and define each shape factor with a proper comparison to the macro feasibility of the chosen component geometry. The limit values that have been calculated by the authors in this paper are slightly different from those calculated in the first paper. From this point of view it is possible that, although the shape factors are a-dimensional coefficients, they are affected by different choices of the users as, for example, the dimensions of the initial blank. Anyway, the small differences in the shape factors limit values do not adversely affect the use of the shape factors in order to predict the feasibility of the product.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)
• Pages: 1134-1139
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.1134
• Online since: July 2015
• Authors: Teresa Primo*, Gabriele Papadia, Antonio Del Prete
• Keywords: CAE, LS-DYNA, Shape Factor, Sheet Hydroforming

References

[1] Zhou L. X., Lang L. H., Danckert J., Zhang S. H., Nielsen K. B., Research on the effect of the local constraints on sheet hydroforming with the movable die, Numisheet Conference 2005, vol. A, pp.532-537.

[2] Carleer B., Van der Kevie G., De Winter L., Van Veldhuizen B., Analysis of the effect of material properties on the hydroforming process of tubes, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 104, 2000, p.158–166.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00530-6

[3] Siegert K., Haussermann M., Loesch B., Rieger R., Recent developments in hydroforming technology, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 98, 2000, pp.251-258.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00206-x

[4] Zhang S. H., Wang Z. R., Xua Y., Wang Z. T., Zhou L. X., Recent developments in sheet hydroforming technology, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 151, 2004, pp.237-241.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.054

[5] A. Del Prete, G. Papadia, Shape factors and feasibility of an industrial product through sheet metal hydroforming, International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference MSEC2009.

DOI: 10.1115/msec2009-84185

[6] LS-Dyna User's Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2007, Version 971.