Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Liquid-Forming

Article Preview

Abstract:

The packaging of liquid products is conventionally realized by using two production stages, which are the stretch blow molding and the filling. In the stretch blow molding process, hot polyethylene terephthalate (PET) preforms are inflated by pressurized air into a cavity to form plastic bottles. In a follow-up process, these packages are filled by a separate machine with the desired liquid product. In contrast to that, liquid-forming combines the blowing and filling stages by directly using the liquid product to form a plastic bottle. Through this substitution, two main challenges arise. Firstly, there are significant inertia effects through the liquid mass, leading to additional reaction forces and a spatially inhomogeneous pressure distribution inside the preform. Secondly, the heat transfer between preform and fluid is drastically increased. Because of this cooling effect, a specific combination of forming speed as well as initial preform and liquid temperatures is necessary to avoid thermally induced preform rupture. This is based on the fact that the formability of PET rapidly declines below its glass transition temperature (Tg). Consequently, a process control requires the knowledge of how the process parameters influence the preform cooling. In this paper, a numerical simulation of the liquid-forming process (LF) is introduced including the preform cooling during forming. In addition, the strain-dependent self-heating effect of PET is implemented. Process experiments under different parameter combinations are conducted using simplified bottle geometry. Through a comparison of the results from experiments and from simulation, the influence of process parameters on the temperature drop and thus on thermally induced failure is determined. In this way, process understanding and control are increased.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

842-847

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G Denis, A Contal, EP 1 529 620 B1, E. P. Office, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] C Desanaux, A Contal, G Denis, EP 1 507 642 B1, E. P. Office, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] F M Schmidt, J F Agassant, M Bellet, L Desoutter Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 64 pp.19-42 (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0377-0257(95)01420-9

Google Scholar

[4] S Wang, A Makinouchi, T Nakagawa Advances in Polymer Technology 17 pp.189-202 (1998).

Google Scholar

[5] X T Pham, F Thibault, L T Lim Polymer Engineering and Science 44 pp.1460-1472 (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] F Thibault, A Malo, B Lanctot, R Diraddo Polymer Engineering and Science 47 pp.289-301 (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] C W Tan, G H Menary, Y Salomeia, C G Armstrong, M Picard, N Billon, E M A Harkin-Jones, P J Martin, K Maheshwari International Journal of Material Forming 1 pp.799-802 (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-008-0296-5

Google Scholar

[8] B Cosson, L Chevalier, G Regnier International Journal of Material Forming 5 pp.39-53 (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] Y-M Luo, L Chevalier, F Utheza, E Monteiro Polymer Engineering & Science (2013).

Google Scholar

[10] S A Jabarin Polymer Engineering and Science 32 pp.1341-1349 (1992).

Google Scholar

[11] Z J Yang, E Harkin-Jones, G H Menary, C G Armstrong Journal of Materials Processing Technology 153 pp.20-27 (2004).

Google Scholar

[12] Z J Yang, E Harkin-Jones, G H Menary, C G Armstrong Polymer Engineering and Science 44 pp.1379-1390 (2004).

Google Scholar

[13] J Zimmer, G Chauvin, M Stommel Polymer Engineering & Science (2014).

Google Scholar

[14] J Zimmer, M Stommel AIP Conference Proceedings (2014).

Google Scholar

[15] C P Buckley, D C Jones Polymer 36 pp.3301-3312 (1995).

Google Scholar

[16] A M Adams, C P Buckley, D P Jones Polymer 41 pp.771-786 (2000).

Google Scholar

[17] B Cosson, F Schmidt, Y Le Maoult, M Bordival International Journal of Material Forming 4 pp.1-10 (2011).

Google Scholar

[18] C Champin, PhD Thesis, Ecole Des Mines de Paris (2007).

Google Scholar

[19] Y M Luo, L Chevalier, F Utheza Proceedings of the ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference On Engineering Systems Design And Analysis pp.1-7 (2012).

Google Scholar

[20] C M A Lopes, M I Felisberti Polym Test 23 pp.637-643 (2004).

Google Scholar

[21] M Thielen, K Hartwig, P Gust Blasformen Von Kunststoffhohlkörpern. Hanser, (2006).

DOI: 10.3139/9783446458567.fm

Google Scholar

[22] E Gorlier, J M Haudin, N Billon Polymer 42 pp.9541-9549 (2001).

Google Scholar

[23] X F Lu, J N Hay Polymer 42 pp.8055-8067 (2001).

Google Scholar