Development and Characterization of Polymer Mixture (Binder) Based on Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) for a Superalloy A-286 to Powder Injection Moulding (MIM) Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Metal injection moulding (MIM) has over the past decade established itself as a competitive manufacturing process to produce in large quantities small precision components with complex shape which would be costly to produce by alternative methods. In this process, during the injection phase, segregation appears in the feedstock and defects will be appears in the component during the sintering. To limit this effect, during decades a vast variety of binder systems have been developed. Binder systems are formulated as a mixture of different organic or inorganic substances with several functions. Binder system has the main commitments of giving the necessary rheological behavior to the feedstocks for injection moulding to transport the powder particles into the mould cavity and the cohesion of the green part.In this paper a study of the behavior of binders based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) and feedstocks based on superalloy A-286 powder were investigated by Fourier Transform InfraRed spectroscopy (FTIR) coupling with rheology. This methodology permits to compare the rheological behavior of the materials with the thermal behavior of the binder at a temperature close to the temperature of injection. Analyzes was made for the mixing and injection process. It is shows relationship between interactions and miscibility of polymer and influences on the rheological and mechanical behavior. All methodologies revealed no chemical interactions between the powder and the binder. This result shows the formulation of binder for the superalloy A-286 is not homogenous and the PEG is degraded under mixing and injection process conditions of this kind of formulation of feedstock.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

824-829

Citation:

Online since:

July 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.K. Enneti, Powder binder formulation and compound manufacture in metal injection molding (MIM), Handbook of metal injection molding (2012) 64-92.

DOI: 10.1533/9780857096234.1.64

Google Scholar

[2] C. Quinard, J. Song, T. Barrière, J.C. Gelin, Elaboration of PIM feedstocks with 316L fine stainless steel powders for the processing of micro-components, Powder Technology 208 (2011) 383-389.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.08.033

Google Scholar

[3] K.C. Tam, S.P. Yap, M.L. Foong, N.H. Loh, Metal Injection Moulding: effects of the vinyl acetate content on binder behavior, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 67 (1997) 120-125.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(96)02830-0

Google Scholar

[4] G. Thavanayagan, K.L. Pickering, J.E. Swan, P. Cao, Analysis of rheological behavior of titanium feedstocks formulated with a water-soluble binder system for powder injection moulding, Powder Technology 269 (2015) 227-232.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.09.020

Google Scholar

[5] C. Quinard, T. Barrière, J.C. Gelin, Development and property identification of 316L stainless steel feedstock for PIM and µPIM, Powder Technology 190 (2009) 123-128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2008.04.044

Google Scholar

[6] Ö. Özgün, H. Özkan Gülsoy, R. Yilmaz, F. Findik, Injection moulding of nickel based 625 superalloy: sintering, heat treatment, microstructure and mechanical properties, Journal of alloys and compounds 5476 (2013) 192-207.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.08.069

Google Scholar

[7] Ö. Özgün, H. Özkan Gülsoy, R. Yilmaz, F. Findik, Microstructural and mechanical characterization of injection molded 718 superalloy powders, Journal of alloys and compounds 576 (2013) 140-153.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.04.042

Google Scholar

[8] L. Urterkin, I. Uslan, I. Tuc, Investigation of Properties of Powder Injection-Molded Steatites, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 21 (2011) 358–365.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-011-9901-8

Google Scholar

[9] J. Hidalgo, A. Jimenez-Morales, J.M. Torralba, Thermal stability and degradation kinetics of feedstocks for powder injection moulding, Polymer Degradation and Stability 98 (2013) 1188-1195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.03.018

Google Scholar

[10] E. Finocchio, C. Cristiani, G. Dotelli, P.G. Stampino, Thermal evolution of PEG-based and Brij-based hybrid organo-inorganic materials. FT-IR studies, Vibrational Spectroscopy 71 (2014) 47-56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2013.12.010

Google Scholar

[11] J. Suzuki, Study on ozone treatment of water-soluble polymers. I. Ozone degradation of Polyethylene Glycol in water, Journal of applied polymer science 20 (1976) 93-103.

DOI: 10.1002/app.1976.070200109

Google Scholar

[12] S. Han, C. Kim, D. Kwon, Thermal degradation of poly(ethyleneglycol), Polymer degradation and stability 47 (1995) 203-208.

DOI: 10.1016/0141-3910(94)00109-l

Google Scholar

[13] J. Hidalgo, J.P. Fernandez-Blazquez, A. Jimenez-Morales, T. Barrière, J.C. Gelin, J.M. Torralba, Effect of the particle size and solids volume fraction on the thermal degradation behavior of INVAR 36 feedstocks, Polymer Degradation and Stability 98 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.09.015

Google Scholar